Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
2
Votes
Kurtis Eaton
  • New to Real Estate
  • Birmingham, AL
2
Votes |
6
Posts

Should I invest in Short-Term Rental or Traditional SF? property?

Kurtis Eaton
  • New to Real Estate
  • Birmingham, AL
Posted

Hi. I'm new to this and currently educating myself on deal analysis, finance and other basics. My question is whether I should pursue a short-term vacation rental property or a traditional SF home (or small 1-4 unit multi) for my first deal? It would seem to me that the ROI & cash flow are more appealing on the STR; am I missing something? What are the pros and cons of each?

Thanks in advance for any advice...

Kurt

  • Kurtis Eaton
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    972
    Posts
    1,154
    Votes
    Ken Boone
    • Investor
    • Greenville, SC
    1,154
    Votes |
    972
    Posts
    Ken Boone
    • Investor
    • Greenville, SC
    Replied

    Yea it depends what you want to be doing and what your goals are.  I started with LTRs to get some experience and then switched to STRs as LTRs at my age was not going to get me where I wanted to go fast enough.  I have a mgmt company for my LTRs they charge 8% and that makes my LTR investments about 97% passive.  Passive is good.  They cash flow well but still not fast enough to get where I wanted to go.  I switched to STRs and they make a boat load of cash flow, but we manage those ourselves because mgmt companies for STRs charge a much higher rate.  Which is expected as there is a lot more work involved.  So since we manage ourselves there is work - it is not passive income.  In my case the time it takes for the work is easily worth the cash flow and we have the time available to do it.  Quite honestly I am now struggling with the idea of what I want to do next.  Keep rolling with more STRs or take the cash flow from the STRs and put them back into more LTRs since they are passive.  I don't think I can wrong either way.  Just trying to figure out what I want to do.

    Loading replies...