Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

152
Posts
24
Votes
Bruce P.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
24
Votes |
152
Posts

Is an editable PDF over email the same as a signature?

Bruce P.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hi, a friend of mine is using Bigger Pocket's editable forms for house hacking roommates. Does a new tenant roommate filling that out in the various signature fields and sending it back over email basically constitute the same legal agreement as if they signed their own signature with a pen? There's all kinds of e-signing services these days like Docusign and it seems the same in principle, but just curious as there seems to be so much minutiae with respect to real estate laws.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6
Posts
5
Votes
Michael D.
  • Attorney
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
5
Votes |
6
Posts
Michael D.
  • Attorney
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Replied

@Bruce Park

I’m not quite sure what kind of signing you are describing exactly, and in any event I can’t give specific legal advice but I can talk generalities. E-signed leases are enforceable generally, but one still needs to be able to attribute the signature to a particular person -the signer- and overall make sure that there is evidentiary support that the signer is indeed who they say they are, in case they try to deny it later. This is where services like DocuSign become handy because it locks the documents and tracks various attributes like where it was signed, the IP address and a lot of other info which could be used in court as evidence of who the signer was. It could cut both ways by the way: if I sign a document for my wife at home while she is at work, one could present evidence that it wasn’t her and thus the signature ineffective. So the bottom line is you have to assess your own risk tolerance.

If it was me, I would not be inclined to accept someone just typing in their name and treating it as a signature, if that’s what you are describing.

Loading replies...