Yes, I'm not worried about that I don't think. My thoughts center around the fact that at least part of the overall mortgage would be financed at 4% or less as opposed to all of it being financed at 8%+-
If they are assumable, remember that they will want a larger down payment as the property has most likely appreciated since the original purchase.
@Ryan Muska. Under assumable FHA loan can i live in there for 1 year and then rent it out as vacation after a year? Thanks.
I would assume that is fine. But I am not licensed in CA and cannot provide CA-specific advice on FHA loans, speak with a lender that is licensed there.
Ah, I didn't even think of this part. Anyone know what the actual rule is?
Under this scenario, would the new owner have to occupy for a year?
The way I see it is since we aren't disturbing the original mortgage and just taking it over, if the one year requirement has been met (which is a guarantee under this scenario) why would it have to be met again?