Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
4
Votes
Patrick Ma
  • Investor
  • Sugar Land, TX
4
Votes |
19
Posts

LLC to hold rental properties in Texas for Solo 401K Investment??

Patrick Ma
  • Investor
  • Sugar Land, TX
Posted

I'm reading that a Solo 401K Trust is already protected from creditors and bankruptcy in Texas. That said, does it protect you in the case of a tenant sueing the owner if the Solo 401K owns the rental property? I'm considering whether I need to create an LLC to hold the rental property on behalf of the Solo 401K trust and like to hear other's opinion. Is this prudent or a wasted layer for Texas rental properties?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,878
Posts
2,536
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,536
Votes |
2,878
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Patrick Ma

The Solo 401(k) is separate from you and does insulate you from liability in the event someone sues related to a 401(k) held property.

If the large majority of the Solo 401(k) holdings are the property, then a LLC inside the 401(k) does not necessarily add much benefit. Good quality insurance would be valuable.

If the plan itself has significant other holdings of cash or other non-liability producing assets, then isolating a property with a LLC held by the plan could be beneficial. In that case, a litigant would be going after the LLC, and the plan itself (and other non-LLC assets within the plan) would be shielded.

Loading replies...