Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Boise Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
1
Votes
Nate Ramsey
1
Votes |
2
Posts

FHA Owner-Occupied, First Home - Bad Idea Near Boise?

Nate Ramsey
Posted

Hello all,

I'm in my mid-20s, and have saved up enough to purchase up to around 300k property with FHA loan, and have a few months emergency fund left over.

For a while I've had the idea of purchasing a duplex or triplex, and occupying one of the units, letting the other unit(s) cover the mortgage/taxes while I pour what I'd be paying into rent into savings for the next property. Unfortunately, in the past year that I've been watching for properties, I haven't seen any properties even coming close to this.

I've recently been reading about this "1% rule" that investors aim for, and this is making me think this is not a great idea. I'm only seeing up to around 0.5% in the units I've been seeing.

I'm willing to go out as far as Emmett/Horseshoe Bend, but even casting the net that wide hasn't been very successful, either. It seems like as you go further from Boise/Meridian, the rents drop by a higher percentage than the property prices (this could just be a feeling rather than reality - I haven't done true side-by-side comparisons).

I would really like to find a place with a garage for each unit, or at minimum space to build a small shop, so that has narrowed my search some - however, I've been watching listings that do not match that criteria and have still failed to find any.

What advice do you have for someone looking to finally move out on their own, that would like to leverage the FHA opportunity to build a future? There are some times that I am just tempted to go with a nice "forever home" property (I've seen a few of them that are tempting) and be done with the idea of real estate investing... But I know this is an immediate gratification vs. long-term financial wellness decision, so have been holding off.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,876
Posts
2,466
Votes
Jaysen Medhurst
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greenwich, CT
2,466
Votes |
4,876
Posts
Jaysen Medhurst
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greenwich, CT
Replied

@Nate Ramsey, focus on 3- or 4-unit properties. Duplexes are very unlikely to make the cut.

Give up on the garage and shop thing for now. Find a property the works as an investment, first and foremost. You're young and, frankly, at this point you don't even know what a "forever" home really looks like.

If there's anyway you can go with a low-down payment conventional loan, instead of a FHA, do it. There is less paperwork, no up-front PMI, and monthly PMI will drop once you hit 78-80% LTV.

What about something like this? What would the rents be here? I know it's above your current price range, but the bank should be willing to consider 75% of rents. 

  • Jaysen Medhurst
  • Loading replies...