Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

103
Posts
25
Votes
Ron Hollingsworth
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
25
Votes |
103
Posts

Hard Money Draw Question

Ron Hollingsworth
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

So I've done a few flips using hard money and I'm running into the issue of them sending out their inspector to verify work, however between the time that I sent the lender the SOW (while in escrow) and the time we actually start work, the scope changes.  Usually once we start the project, we learn of new or additional repairs that have to be done.  We spend the time and money to address these "new" issues, however the lender/inspector have not been taking these repairs into consideration when approving the next draw.  So, the draw is less than it needs to be putting me in a situation where I need to come in with additional cash outside of what I have budgeted for the project.  This screws up other projects or my personal finances.  Can anyone share with me what I could do differently to circumvent this issue?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,496
Posts
2,239
Votes
Stuart Udis
#3 All Forums Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
2,239
Votes |
1,496
Posts
Stuart Udis
#3 All Forums Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Replied

The budget that's submitted to the lender should have a contingency line item. You can usually shift cost figures around if the scope was completed for less than the initial budget indicated. By way of example if your budget included $20,000 for framing and you only spent $15,000, the lender should allow for the $5,000 that was not spent to be shifted elsewhere in the budget. As a general rule of thumb, its best to overstate your contingencies in your construction budget. This is particularly the case when the contingency is baked into the loan. A lot of borrowers are too focused on their out of pocket cash at time of the acquisition or loan funding and opt to keep their budgets lean for the sake of reducing their cash requirement on day 1. This is because most construction lenders will look at the total project cost and require 20%-25% to be funded by the borrower. Therefore, the bigger the budget, the more cash needed up front. I am a strong proponent for understanding the max LTV and funding parameters of the lenders and as long as the LTV falls within the lender guidelines, add as much contingency funds (and interest reserve) as you are able. Usually an additional $5,000 of cash up front translates to an additional $15,000 in contingent funds. There's nothing worse than being involved in a project that is incorrectly funded. Shortfalls in funding kill deals, even if purchased correctly. Being properly funded goes along way towards ensuring your projects smoothly get to the finish line.

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...