Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Chris Lidfeldt
  • Orlando , FL
0
Votes |
7
Posts

Rent property for 1 year, fix up and sell

Chris Lidfeldt
  • Orlando , FL
Posted

I would like to know people's opinion on an idea I have below. I have some (but not a ton) of experience renting and selling properties and would like to know if something is flawed in my logic. Of course I would do all my due diligence on any decisions made and would like to know if there's anything materially wrong with what I'm suggesting below.

I am interested in buying a property that needs to be fixed up but is in good enough condition to rent. I would buy a house that suggests I will buy at a favorable price to rent ratio AND a favorable resale value if flipped.

My intention is to buy the house all cash and rent the house for one year. During this year of course I would being collecting cash flow. Then after a year I would fix the house up and resell it at a profit. The point of waiting a year is to avoid short term capital gains tax thus paying long term capital gains tax.

Another advantage of selling after a year is to avoid getting "stuck" with a house because housing prices go down. In the course of one year a house typically won't increase or decrease materially.

The plan would be to do this over and over again if successful. This would also be side income for me as this would not be my day job. Besides all the typical rental and flip risks that I'm well aware of are there any major downsides I'm not thinking of?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

379
Posts
740
Votes
Michael Hayworth
  • Contractor
  • Fort Worth, TX
740
Votes |
379
Posts
Michael Hayworth
  • Contractor
  • Fort Worth, TX
Replied

@Chris Lidfeldt, this is generally what I do. I keep a stable of about 15 rentals.  Usually, when I buy a house, I'll do a light reno, if needed, add it to the stable, and then sell it after 1-3 years. Before selling, I'll do more, such as granite countertops and updated fixtures.

When I started out, I would sell two houses for every one I kept. I was short on funds, and the two I sold  would fund the one I kept. But I was in a pretty low tax bracket, so short-term flips didn't cost much more in taxes than long term holds. Fast forward 3-4 years, and my businesses have really taken off. I'm now in the 40% tax bracket.  So if I have a 40,000 profit on a house, the difference between LT and ST capital gains (40% vs. 20%) is $8000 - fairly significant. Plus, in my market, values have usually increased a few percent over the 1-2 year hold period. (That won't last forever, of course.)

You do have to take care that you don't overspend by doing a two-phase renovation. I try not to over-renovate in the first phase and try to make sure the things I do won't need to be redone in phase 2.

This strategy really isn't necessary when you're in lower tax brackets, but as you get into the higher brackets, it makes a big difference.

  • Michael Hayworth
  • Loading replies...