Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

37
Posts
2
Votes
Zach Whitt
  • Dallas, TX
2
Votes |
37
Posts

Hard Money + Equity Partner

Zach Whitt
  • Dallas, TX
Posted

The plan is to flip a property using an equity partner to provide the cash reserves and a hard money lender for the bulk of the purchase and rehab.

We originally planned on all cash, in which case we would split gains/losses 50/50. Money partner would provide all the capital, and I would do all of the work (not the actual flipping work, we will use contractors).

Now, he's decided against using all cash and would instead like to contribute $50k to the deal and finance the rest with debt. How should this be split? My thought is that the $50 should be used as cash reserves. But will the equity still be split 50/50? I would think more like 30% to the equity partner and 70% to me. Is that off base?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

597
Posts
259
Votes
Mike G.
  • Rehabber / Flipper
  • Simi Valley, CA
259
Votes |
597
Posts
Mike G.
  • Rehabber / Flipper
  • Simi Valley, CA
Replied

My thought would be he would get 50% of the profit from the percentage of the investment that his $50k buys. So let's say the total costs are $150k. He would then get 50% of 1/3 of the profit, because he is covering 1/3 of the total cost. If you gave him, as you suggest, 50% of the total profit, and the other lender 50% of the total profit, you would end up with 0. Even if you give the other lender a fixed percentage (such as a hard money lender), you would still be getting a raw deal. In my opinion, if he wants a profit split, it has to be proportional to his investment.

Loading replies...