Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

48
Posts
18
Votes
Matt C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Jupiter, FL
18
Votes |
48
Posts

Owner Finance vs. Conventional to Buy Rental Property

Matt C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Jupiter, FL
Posted

I am looking at a property to buy and hold as a rental. It is a 3 bed, 2, bath, 2 car garage, 1,800 sq. ft. built in 1980. It will need carpet, paint and a few minor repairs. The rental comps are $1100. I will be able to get that for this house, maybe a little more.

The owner wants $80,000, that’s his number; I might do a little better. The comps are around $110,000. I am estimating $12,000 in repairs to get it ready to rent.

The owner said he would consider owner financing but on a max 10 year term. We didn’t talk down payment or rates. I chose 8% interest and 5% and 10% down. I don’t know if he would agree to these terms. I have not bought a property with owner financing, so I might be doing the math wrong. With that said; I came up with this:

    1. Owner financed, 10 years, 8% interest, 5% down, payment of $922, PITI $1168, cash down $4000

    2.Owner financed, 10 years, 8% interest, 10% down, payment of $874, PITI $1120, cash down $8000

    3.Conventional, 15 years, 5% interest, 20%, payment, payment of $506, PITI $752, cash down $16,000

    4.Conventional, 30 years, 5% interest, 20%, payment, payment of $344, PITI $590, cash down $16,000

With these numbers, it has a very negative cash flow for the owner financing scenarios. Both of the conventional routes should produce a decent cash flow. All the other variables will be the same, vacancy rate, repairs, etc.

I am in a cash position to absorb the negative cash flow. However, my current investing mind set is cash flow driven. Would you consider the owner financing on the 10 year term? Less cash to get into the deal and year 11 would look pretty good. Or would you put in more cash up front to have cash flow from the beginning?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,088
Posts
3,921
Votes
Brian Gibbons
  • Investor
  • Sherman Oaks, CA
3,921
Votes |
6,088
Posts
Brian Gibbons
  • Investor
  • Sherman Oaks, CA
Replied

What about getting a private lender for $75K, all cash at interest only at 6%? and own it, re fi down the road the Private Mortgage?

6% in a SDIRA.

See this for explanation.

http://equity-university.trustetc.com/library/general-resources/private-bank-concept

Loading replies...