Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

67
Posts
53
Votes
Nina Grayson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
53
Votes |
67
Posts

Owner-Occupied 3-Partner Investment Scenario - Any Thoughts?

Nina Grayson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I have two investor partners  who want to do a deal that includes one partner owner-occupying a unit.  Do you think this structure is a good deal?

Location:  Los Angeles County

Partner 1 (P1)

- P1 wants to owner-occupy with family of four (spouse and two children)

- Prequaled self (not including spouse) for $435k.  Lender ran numbers assuming a duplex, with 2nd unit as income.   

- Down $80k

- $435k would only get P1 properties in South LA, which does not meet P1 standard of living, so P1 decided to get one or two more partners to increase buying power for a better location.  

Partner 2 (P2)

- P2 is an Agent and will use commission as carry 

- Maximum purchase price $1.2 mil.

- Comm. is approx. $20k. 

Partner 3 (P3)

- P3 will take out up to $200k from equity in SFR for down

Partners will form an LLC for the purchase

-6 plex, Two 2Br, Four 1Br

- Total Down = $300k (25%)

- Loan Amt. = $900k

-Terms = 30 year, 4.5%

- Monthly payment = $5600

- Monthly Expenses = $1000

- Rents = $9600

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,365
Posts
1,249
Votes
Manolo D.#3 Contractors Contributor
  • Contractor
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,249
Votes |
4,365
Posts
Manolo D.#3 Contractors Contributor
  • Contractor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Nina Grayson Well, that’s the normal sharing, what if market dips, so the 1,000k (for simple computation, instead of 1,200k) one owns 10% and others 50% and another 40%. Now the property at year 1 is at 900k and 50% wants out, it will be a breach of contract but he doesn’t care, he wants out, he thinks at year 3, the property will be worth 750k. What will you do? I’ve tried structuring even just 2 parties, and i couldn’t even cover all the what ifs, i was on page 15 with a single space font 10 contract and i think I covered 30-40% on what I should cover. make 3k of 300k is already a bit scary itself. Good luck though.

Loading replies...