Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

FHA or 30-year Conventional?
I am currently saving up to buy my first deal. In an ideal world, it would be a "house-hack" but I'm not optimistic that I will find a Duplex or Triplex that my wife will be thrilled to call "home". With that being the case, I want to purchase a nice/small SFH, condo or townhouse that will make sense as a rental property for later on when we decide to move.
My question: should I get an FHA loan and put less down in order to jumpstart my savings towards another property or should I get a conventional loan (20% down) to get a better rate/lower mortgage rate so that it will cash flow better once we rent it out.
For context: we both have solid jobs and will likely be able to save 18-25k each year to invest in real estate. My goal is to use a buy-and-hold strategy to accumulate 10-20 rental properties in the next decade. Ultimately, I'd like to have $10,000 per month in passive income by age 40 (14 years from now)
Any advice/feedback would be appreciated!
Most Popular Reply

Just my 2 cents @Benjamin Kennel, I would always try and avoid over-leveraging yourself where you can. I love that you have a plan and that plan is actually realistic and not overly aggressive (although remember $10k in 14 years will not buy you what it does today so plan accordingly).
An FHA will probably require PMI anyway so you your cash flows might be the same either way on whatever you decide so I would just go with the conventional with 20-25% down and it will be ready to roll as rental when you are ready to move on.
Good luck!