View report

*This link comes directly from our calculators, based on information input by the member who posted.

@David Whalen 3% vacancy is nice if that's on par for your market.  I would verify that.  It is not a bad idea to run 2 models, 1 with appropriate market vacancy for the area and asset type but also when you place a tenant who renews.  Important to keep in mind both scenarios are accurate, the former is typical over time but the latter is a better yearly expectation with stable tenants.  

Also I see the 5% for maintenance but nothing for Capex, are those major items all fairly new?