Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Coronavirus Government Assistance Programs
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

507
Posts
170
Votes
Kevin Phu
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Diego, CA
170
Votes |
507
Posts

Proposed: Landlord Relief Fund

Kevin Phu
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minnesota, introduced a bill in the U.S. House calling for a nationwide cancellation of rent and mortgage payments until the coronavirus pandemic has ended which also would include the creation of a Landlord Relief Fund that would cover the rental income lost. For a landlord to receive those funds, they would be required to follow federal guidelines for fair lending and renting practices for five years. The guidelines, which can also be found in the text here, are:

i
. a rent freeze;
ii
. just-cause evictions;
iii
. mandatory documentation with any just-cause eviction;
iv
. no source of income discrimination;
v
. coordination with local housing authorities to make new vacancies eligible
to voucher holders;
vi
. provision of 10 percent equity to tenants; and,
vii
. no admissions restrictions on the basis of:
1. sexual identity or orientation,
2. gender identity or expression,
3. conviction or arrest record,
4. credit history, or
5. immigration status.
viii
. Additionally, landlords cannot attempt to collect any back-rent when the
moratorium is lifted,
ix
. they cannot retaliate in any way against residents and
x
. they cannot report residents to debt collectors or debt services to harm
their credit.

Now, chances are that it would never get past the Senate and be signed into law but this is ridiculous. How do you guys interpret require VI "provision of 10 percent equity to tenants"? Is that saying the tenant's would have a right to 10% of the properties equity? I don't quite understand. 

Loading replies...