Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

44
Posts
24
Votes
Makan A Tabrizi
24
Votes |
44
Posts

New (ish) Colorado law Lowering Income Requirement

Makan A Tabrizi
Posted

Colorado limited income qualification to 2X rent recently. Does anyone have a strategy to protect against less-than-qualified tenants getting approved? I used to charge the equivalent of one monthly deposit for qualified tenants (when it was OK to screen based on 3X rent). Should I be increasing my deposit requirement to the two months max allowable to mitigate some of the risk? I remember when I lived in LA paying first, last, and deposit was standard but that was when rents were lower. It seems like a lot to ask nowadays for the equivalent of 3 times rent upfront. Then again I don't have any other solutions. Any suggestions would be appreciated.  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

44
Posts
24
Votes
Makan A Tabrizi
24
Votes |
44
Posts
Makan A Tabrizi
Replied
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Makan A Tabrizi, sounds dumb but actually not as different than you think!

People can't pay rent on GROSS income 2x rent, so this must mean they intend NET income not GROSS income. The legislator's there are obviously not fit to make these decisions because that is a pretty big and obvious omission in the text of the law.

https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2023a_184_signe...

The rule of thumb is generally GROSS income 3x rent which is pretty close to NET income 2x rent. So, they really didn't change anything substantial there!

A note of greater concern is nearer the bottom of the law. The tenants "cash assets" count towards their yearly income. So, if a tenant earns $30k but has $10k in savings their "income" is considered to be $40k for application purposes. 

Here are a couple ideas:

1) That part of the law seems to ONLY apply if you use credit scores/reports. So, if you don't you can use any criteria you want.

2) If you do use a credit report, you could tighten things up by looking at their monthly debt. I also require "Rent + Monthly Debt Payments<= 45% x Gross Income".

However with the new law you couldn't use this income requirement. So, you could simply set a maximum debt percentage like "Monthly Debt Payments <= 50% rent". That quite as accurate, but for the most part accomplishes a similar screening without using income.

For me, I would probably drop credit from my screening and RAISE my income requirement. If they have more income and no evictions or civil judgements I would be fairly confident. 


 Thank you for your input, most helpful. 

Loading replies...