Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

136
Posts
55
Votes
Travis C.
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
55
Votes |
136
Posts

Apartment vs SFH Investing

Travis C.
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted
It seems I read on BP more frequently that apartment investing seems to be better overall than SFH investing. I have always bought SFH's, but may be open to multifamily as an option. From an investor's point of view, what risks are there with apartments versus SFH's? It would seem that maintenance risks are only multiplied which is one of the main risks that pops into my head. I like SFH's in this way because I can compartmentalize risks around maintenance. How do you multifamily investors get comfortable with this and other risks that may not reside as loudly with SFHs? Or am I viewing this all wrong?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

401
Posts
394
Votes
Michael Bishop
  • United States
394
Votes |
401
Posts
Michael Bishop
  • United States
Replied

Travis, that all depends on your level of involvement and whether you're interested in doing small MF with one or two investors, or whether you're interested in larger MF as a passive investor.

When it comes to the ladder, I'd say there are less risks due to economies of scale and other things:

1. Maintenance and other expenses can be marginally reduced based off of a discounted rate for a higher number of units.

2. Vacancy costs are far less risky. With a SFH, if a tenant leaves unexpectedly, you're left covering the mortgage. In a 100 unit MFH, if three tenants up and leave, you've still got 97 other rents covering their portion.

3. A number of studies have shown that MFH (large MFH in particular) are MUCH more recession-resistant than SFHs.

These are just a couple of thoughts that pop in to my head immediately. If you'd like to discuss the topic further, feel free to connect!

Loading replies...