Seller failed to obtained clear tittle 2 days before closing

Seller failed to obtained clear tittle 2 days before closing

Rental Property Investor · Baton Rouge, LA · Member since 2018 · 151 posts · 13 votes

So on may of 2025, I sign an purchase agreement with a seller to buy his house for $350,000.  $0 down close in $30 days.  Within a week, I did an inspection and an appraisal. The seller asked me for the appraisal but I did not give it to him since the house appraised for $390,000. 

about 15 days after the contract was signed, the title company found out that the house had an IRS lien on it due to his wife and this being a community state. Seller new about the lien and never disclosed it. Additionally, seller had made multiple payments to the IRS for that lien. Seller asured me that we would be able to close but woudl need an extension so we extended the closing by another 3 weeks.  

a few days before the three weeks ended, the seller said that the IRS required an appraisal in order to release the lien.  So I provided mine. 

then he also asked for another extension. So we extended the closing until the end of June 2025. 

I was going to rent the house out. So I found the tenants and make the seller sign a property management agreement in order for me to rent the house out. The house rented out for $3300/month. 

on June 25, he asked for another extension so I agree to extend it until August 1,2025. All this time the seller asured me in writing (text that he would be able to release the house and remove the lien). 

2 days before August 1, he asked for one more extension so I agree to extend until September 1, 2025. By this point the rent money was going to the owner and we still were nowhere near to getting the lien removed. 


two days before closing seller sent me an email saying that "they tried with good faith to get the lien removed but will not be able to sell the property". 

I used the atartday purchase agreement which states that the seller has to pay 10% of the purchase price if he backs out. Will this counts as that? 

it's my understanding that the seller can still sell the property but the IRS would take any and all equity from the sale of the house.  Is this true? 

any recommendations on how to approach this situation?

0Reply
88 views

Most Popular Reply

Drew SygitBusiness Member
Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
1y

@Allen Lopez you made a LOT of mistakes!

You should have:

1) Involved an attorney when seller disclosed IRS liens.

2) Required seller to supply copies of their IRS communications as a condition to extend contract.

3) Required seller to reimburse you for your inspection costs to extend contract

4) Required seller to reimburse you for your appraisal expence to get a copy of it.

5) Never tried to rent out the property given the IRS lien and NO ONE ELSE but seller knowing what's going on with the IRS release!

What's your exposure with the tenant you signed a lease with?

You'll need to hire an attorney ASAP to protect you and pursue the seller.

See this reply in the discussion

4 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    1y
    Assuming the irs lien plus the mortgage owed covered the payoff. Then this is not getting clear title as title would be clear / satisfied based on sales price. That’s what you need to figure / determine
    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Lender · Charleston, SC · Member since 2019 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    If the house is sold, any and all liens on it would need to be satisfied prior to the seller get a single cent, unless you agreed to purchase the house subject to the existing liens (which you absolutely should not do). The seller may be able still sell the property as long as the transaction proceeds would cover the full payment of the liens; otherwise, this would be a short-sale and one or all of the lienholders would have to agree to a short payoff. There is also a possibility that the IRS is preventing the transfer/liquidation of any assets, similarly to a BK proceeding. I would consult with a real estate attorney on this question. I recommend either Ashley Donald at Legacy Title or Scott Sternberg at Sternberg Naccari and White. 

    My guess is that the seller is electing not to sell the property because they wont receive anything from the sale due to the liens. As far as whether they would actually owe the 10% liquidated damages in this case for defaulting on the contract, that would likely be determined by the language and contingencies in the contract. Even if you are owed this money, actually collecting it will be another matter entirely. It will probably take a lawsuit to do so and even then, it sounds like the IRS is ahead of you in line to get paid. I would consult with an attorney on this as well. 

  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    1y

    @Allen Lopez you made a LOT of mistakes!

    You should have:

    1) Involved an attorney when seller disclosed IRS liens.

    2) Required seller to supply copies of their IRS communications as a condition to extend contract.

    3) Required seller to reimburse you for your inspection costs to extend contract

    4) Required seller to reimburse you for your appraisal expence to get a copy of it.

    5) Never tried to rent out the property given the IRS lien and NO ONE ELSE but seller knowing what's going on with the IRS release!

    What's your exposure with the tenant you signed a lease with?

    You'll need to hire an attorney ASAP to protect you and pursue the seller.

    • Rental Property Investor · Baton Rouge, LA · Member since 2018 · 151 posts · 13 votes
      1y

      @Drew Sygit agree. I didn't consider any of that. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.