Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
5
Votes
Tevin Russell
  • San Antonio, TX
5
Votes |
16
Posts

Lead List Filtering Question

Tevin Russell
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted

For those of you who get lists from public sources, free or paid, they obviously are bloated with non qualifying leads that need to be trimmed like banks, LLC's, recently sold, etc.

Beyond this I'm not 100% sure what I should be keeping on the list and what I should be eliminating.

What are some traits you guys look for when filtering you lead lists?

Thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

112
Posts
64
Votes
Wes Short
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Indianapolis, IN
64
Votes |
112
Posts
Wes Short
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Indianapolis, IN
Replied

Hey Tevin, a lot of people included search criteria such as equity, mortgage type, last sale of the home, absentee owners, and age of owner. You normally want 50-100% equity in the home, a home that has sold within the past 15-20 years, absentee owners because it is difficult to manage from far away, and an older owner because they are often more motivated and looking to get out of real estate. I haven't done a lot of list sourcing but these are some of the common criteria that people search.

  • Wes Short
  • Loading replies...