More context is necessary. The best structure will be dependent on the transaction type, GP's skills & contribution to the transaction as well as the LP's contributuion and objectives. For illustration purposes, the structure tha's used for a GP who also self performs construction and is building for-sale single family homes is going to be different than the GP who outsources construction and builds large apartment buildings or develops a last mile industrial center that has a tenant commitment in place. My advice is to narrow in and weigh structures when comparing apples to apples, not apples to oranges.
More context is necessary. The best structure will be dependent on the transaction type, GP's skills & contribution to the transaction as well as the LP's contributuion and objectives. For illustration purposes, the structure tha's used for a GP who also self performs construction and is building for-sale single family homes is going to be different than the GP who outsources construction and builds large apartment buildings or develops a last mile industrial center that has a tenant commitment in place. My advice is to narrow in and weigh structures when comparing apples to apples, not apples to oranges.
For those raising capital, are you using a traditional LP/GP model, SPVs, or another structure? What’s worked best for you, and why? Let’s discuss.
We are an open-ended fund so we did our model as a corporation and investors invest within the company. We kept it very simple from a fund standpoint so we do not have multiple entities etc, we have one. For a single asset syndication other models may fit better but for what we are doing this was the best model - thus why its important to understand and speak to an auditor, CPA and attorney to know what is the best strategy.