Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brian Hughes

Brian Hughes has started 9 posts and replied 267 times.

Post: Seattle Zoning Ordinances

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

LR1 is Lowrise 1 -  low density multifamily.   The rules have changed a bit since I became familar with them,  but it used to mean one unit per 1600sf of lot space with height and lot coverage / floor area ratio limits.   Now IIRC there is no unit count limit,  but the height and lot coverage ratio still apply.   A bunch of other factors impact the rules as well like urban village overlay,  proximity to transit,  and MHA fee zone.

Seattle's website has all this info:

https://www.seattle.gov/sdci/codes/codes-we-enforce-(a-z)/zoning

http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/SDCI/Codes/MultifamilyZoningSummary.pdf

Post: Kent Rental house registration program

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

That sounds like a great question to ask the City of Kent.   You are already under contract so to some degree its a moot point,  but you might be able to get some feel for how they will react before you have to deal with it.  

  If the zoning allows for the number of units,   I'm guessing they will have an answer such as 'The unit will need to be permitted and brought up to code as necessary'  which for an established unit will probably mean they look at things like presence of smoke/CO detection devices,  window egress requirements,  and other basic safety and habitabilty requirements.  The biggest gotchas might be if the ceiling is low or the room(s) don't meet minimum size/geometry requirements,  the building requires a fire sprinkler system and that unit doesn't have one,  or if the city decides the unit must meet some kind of energy efficiency standards.   However we are talking about Kent here,  not Seattle.    If the nonconforming unit was built reasonably well it may not be to big of a deal.   If it is an unfinished basement with a stove in one corner and a toilet in the other,   it probably isn't habitable.   (I've seen a couple "units" like that)    We are in a so-called housing "crisis" so hopefully they will be willing to make a path toward legalizing such a unit.  You approaching them about it proactively may help with greasing those skids.

Post: Tenant is in poor health...

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

Check if your state or jurisdiction has specific rules on this - the bluer the area the more likely.   WA state has specific statutes on how to deal with a deceased tenant situation,  which are mostly reasonable though reading through this of course there is a lot of paper trail and accounting involved, and potentially storage of a lot of materials for an extended time period.   Here is the WA version:  

 https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=59.18.595  

but of course YMMV

My triplex (built as, but was in an area downzoned in the 80's to SFR) was grandfathered, but showed on county records and building permits as a triplex. Also has 3 electric meters. I was advised at the time that this was sufficient that if anybody ever complained about its being used as such (triplex rental property) this would be enough that any court would sustain the current use regardless of zoning or if it had been continuously occupied or not.

If the property has 3 electric meters or other improvements that likely had permits in order to be converted for use as a triplex, then regardless of whether it had continued occupancy or not it might be OK.

That said,  I am no land use attorney and you should probably ignore me and talk to one of them.

I guess the other question is what constitutes 'high environmental standard' - high efficiency heating, plumbing and electrical is comparatively easy in many cases.   Upgrading walls and ceilings on an existing structure to be thick enough for R-<bignumber> could cause a lot of problems with existing layout. 

Post: Strategies for selling my LR1 lot for development

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

may we live in interesting times...  :)

Post: Seattle Tenant laws and questions

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

another good organization is rhawa.org  (rental housing association of washington)  -  most of their membership is smaller landlords.   Please consider joining.    They have an excellent monthly newspaper,  locally applicable, attorney reviewed forms included in membership,  screening services, lots of continuing education and networking options,  and provide much needed advocacy for property owners at all levels of government.   they regularly have new landlord orientations, thats a good place to start.

If your rental home is within city of seattle,  hopefully it is RRIO registered (and you are aware of all the tenant protection ordinances in seattle) you should attend a landlord training event that the city puts on periodically as well. 

Also consider attending the annual 'Trends" trade show coming up in December.   if its your first time it will be an overwhelming firehose of info,  but its worth it.

Post: Strategies for selling my LR1 lot for development

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

Hi -

Yes, I am mr. detail oriented.

1) On long close - no I didn't propose about any kind of interest or indexing. In theory if the sale fell through within that 8 months I would get the full EM, which was $50K in my case. To put that in perspective the upper unit was generating about $14K/yr in rent income. Also in theory that meant even if the sale fell through and I had to either list it on MLS or agree to a sale price of $650K with a new buyer I would end up in the same place more or less. OR worst worst case the construction market tanked and I could not sell at all - then I had renovation budget for the building to fix up, rent, and hold for a few more years. I was operating under the opinion that building lot sale prices had peaked and were either flat or declining a bit, so I did not want to get to aggressive in negotiating and I think that ended up being a good move. But yes the longer the closing period the higher the risk of thing going sideways - if prices go up you get screwed as seller, if prices go down too much the buyer walks and (best case) forefeits the EM without a fight or (worst case) comes up with some excuse to try and keep it and you end up in court. I was pretty worried the whole time that the buyer (backed by chinese capital) would walk for various reasons including obvious slowdown in townhouse new construction sales in the area and several resales competing with the new construction, but in the end the transaction closed on time and with no drama. They ARE operating it as a duplex however I have noticed, they rented out the lower unit I had occupied. (without any of the updates I would have done)

Developers want long closing times because it gives them time to plan, find capital for construction, and they don't have to maintain, pay taxes,  or chase out squatters during that time.   If its a middleman or wholesaler they use the time to shop the place around to the ultimate final buyer who will pay the biggest assignment fee.

2)    Reasons for not wanting to be last one to sell -    If the individual lots are being developed as opposed to a much larger parcel (like the edith macefield situation) being assembled its probably less of a risk,   but once a large percentage of the housing has been redeveloped to townhouses where I was a couple things started happening - first the feel of the neighborhood changed from charming, historic residential to modern urban,  and a lot of the initial people who moved into the townhouses said they moved there because they like the lower density but could not afford a "real" house.   Next once a lot of the housing is of the same type as new being built,   there is competition from resales right nearby and around here it seemed the slightly "used" townhouses though still fine were holding down prices on the brand new ones,  which caused them to take a lot longer to sell.   One of the developers (the one who lowballed me the most on his offer) said he was basically done with the area because there was too much competition now.    If you were the last to sell there would be 30 or 40 other townhouse units on your block that the developer would potentially have to compete with after building their 4 or 5 new ones.   Final reason I guess is better odds of being able to time the sale of your property with an adjacent or very nearby one to same buyer,  which is an economy of scale and/or would allow them to build more units,  meaning worth more to them and they may be willing to pay you more.  (if you let them know you know it too)

Post: Rental Potential in Renton WA

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

I live in the area :)   (technically,  upper rainier beach so a bit farther north just into seattle)

Neighborhoods around here do vary widely as to their appeal, type of property most prevalent and the type of tenant they will attract.  A lot of the housing stock in the area dates from postwar up to about 80's.   Skyway hill is cape cod, mid century and split level heaven depending on when the particular subdivision was built.   

My personal experience is with 2-4 unit multifamily properties C/C+ class  (have one in S seattle, one in burien - both with similar tenant bases to what such a property in renton would see) - so if the property you are looking at is similar I can say you will probably get mostly blue collar and service industry working class people.    Given proximity to several large employers like boeing, paccar, etc.  and good commute location to most everywhere if the place is decent and halfway fairly priced you will never have a problem filling a vacancy.   

If its a house or higher end property I can't speak from direct experience but would say overall its a good residential area,  though there are a few pockets here and there one might want to avoid.   Walking, biking or driving around a while will make it clear whats what.

There are a couple (way overpriced) small complexes in downtown renton right now I like,  but the cap rate at asking prices are abysmal.  Listings are fairly recent but I may eventually approach them.   Renton is pretty much top of my list for reinvesting proceeds from my seattle duplex sale.

Post: Strategies for selling my LR1 lot for development

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

I'm no expert having gone through this once,  but I went through a similar experience recently with my duplex (1 unit was owner occ) in georgetown.    It was zoned L2 the entire 10 years I had it, but for the first few years (recovering from the great recession) the neighborhood was stable.  Starting in about 2014 one particular developer "discovered" the neighborhood and systematically bought up and ended up developing about half the lots over the next few years.   At first it was the couple remaining vacant lots,  then the small run down homes,  and then a few decent homes started to sell out to them.   

I decided to sell once two the the 5 adjacent lots to mine had been redeveloped (2 either side, 3 across alley),  and a third had been purchased by a developer.   The remaining two neighbor houses were both smaller and somewhat tired.   Other reasons I chose to sell were to start unwinding my rental portfolio in seattle (I will reinvest someplace south of seattle,  once I know what the legislature tries to do WRT rent control this coming session), that location was getting increasing negative impact from RV camping and property crime, and because while structurally sound and in decent condition,  it was 120 years old and would have required a lot of updates if I wanted to keep it another 10 years as a full on rental.

I had been collecting all the "we buy houses and land" flyers I had been receiving and keeping a spreadsheet.   I also did some research and figured out what all the neighboring lots had sold for and to whom.   There was quite a bit of variability,  all 5000sf level L2 lots and some had sold for 300K and the top sale was $740K.   the highest one happened to be the property right across the alley from mine.   Of course there was a time component too and some of the lower sales were much earlier on. 

At that point I approached several of the authors of those "we buy" letters, and as expected most of them while offering "off market" transactions were brokers working for clients behind the scenes. While they claimed no commission, of course the buyers were paying it and just deducting it from their offer. A lot of these parties also wanted to do assignment deals, e.g. they were wholesaling, birddogging or whatever you call it. Most of them also wanted extended closings (up to a year) I was ok with about 6 months since I needed that time to make my new SFR home habitable before moving there.

I also did enough digging to come up with the mailing address for the LLC that had bought the property across from mine at $740K. I wrote them a snail mail letter and sent it to the address of some house in bellevue with a description of the property, general terms of sale, etc same as I was sending to everybody. In a couple weeks they contacted me and we eventually reached an agreement on price - $700K. I took a bit less than they had paid for the property across teh alley even though mine was a much better property - fully functional and habitable - the one across the alley was not such - but by that point the market on townhouses had started to cool. I didn't want to get greedy and it was a good move I think. The closing period was 8 months to coincide with the tenant's lease ending, and the agreed EM was $50K, nonrefundable. Half was released to me after signed around PSA, thought I did not touch it til the sale closed.

The next best offer I had from the horde of brokers and middlemen was $650K,  most were around $600K.   Lowest was $500K.   I did have one developer who I met with in person who wanted me to 'partner' in the redevelopment - basically by letting him build on the property while I still owned it,  then I would be compensated with a "percentage of the profit".  He seemed decent enough, but we stopped talking after I said "Percentage of sale price" instead,  and I voiced my concern about the point in the economic cycle we are in and 2-3 years til payoff.

The terms of sale I offered were basically - best offer up front - no inspections other than what can be seen by walking interior and exterior property - no "and/or assigns" on offer (no middleman, assignments, etc) - as is no repairs - tenant renewed with month to month agreement before closing - substantial nonrefundable earnest money if extended closing period - no owner financing - buyer pays all non government mandated fees/commissions.    I also made it clear the sale was not a distress sale, and while dated the home was fully functional and habitable and occupied to try and discourage lowballers.   I did say in my offering that I was contacting multiple interested parties.   Some of them were put off by that,  but those are the guys most likely to be looking to get a below market price.   So if they make a fuss about it, let them walk.

I did try to get my adjacent neighbor to sell at the same time as me,  since with a 10000sf lot an additional townhouse unit or two could have been crammed in due to ability to use the space between lots otherwise needing to be set aside for setbacks, and theoretically we both could have gotten a bit more.   However,  the neighbor was not ready to sell yet.   I didn't want to wait another couple of years so I went ahead on my own.

Once I got to an agreed price and basic terms with the buyer,   I got a good recommendation for a RE attorney and worked with him to review the written terms and negotiate details with the buyer.   It was worth the $1200 or so it cost me.

I guess if I were you and I decided I was committed to selling:

1)  I'd work with neighbors and coordinate selling adjacent properties together if at all possible.   Either negotiate together or communicate openly amongst yourselves.
2)  Talk with people who have already sold (sounds like you have) and make sure you know what the going terms are.  Don't take less unless there is a good reason, like unbuildable portion of your lot, etc.
3)  Find an attorney.
4)  Target developers who have a pipeline of projects nearby already.   Talk to people working at the sites - especially if they are NOT wearing a hardhat and swinging the hammers - and you can probably find somebody in charge pretty fast.    Also you can find the investors by going to the open houses on completed units and talking to the agents.   You can also do this with other townhouses just built - go in and ask the agent who the developer is and their info.   They will surely share.    This might also give you some control on the style of building that gets constructed to replace your house since different developers use different plans, etc.
5)  Make it clear to interested parties you are not doing a distress sale and the home is in good condition and price needs to reflect that.
5.5)  Try to avoid middlemen.   That means no brokers,  and nobody who wants to wholesale or do an assignment.   If their offer says "and/or assigns" on the buyer's name, thats what they want to do. It means they want to turn around and assign the sale to somebody else for a fee.   
6)  Try to avoid being the last one to sell out.   If there is a lot of redevelopment activity going on now,  now is probably a good time to sell.  
7)  Don't agree to an extended closing period without a substantial EM (say about 1% of sale price per month) nonrefundable and paid up front if possible.   Note that just because the agreement says nonrefundable doesn't mean you won't have to sue to get it depending on circumstances.  Don't touch it til closing.
   
Again, I'm no expert,  but hope this helps.    

Post: Seattle area appliances

Brian HughesPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 273
  • Votes 220

Sears outlet in kent/tukwila.    They have a lot of appilances that are new floor model and customer/warantee returns, out-of-box, (sometimes big) scratch/dent and that type of thing.    Also one in tacoma.      You can check their inventory online I'm pretty sure.   

Note despite the name they are an independent company to Sears department stores afaik.