Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Christopher Bell

Christopher Bell has started 2 posts and replied 13 times.

Quote from @Chad Gray:

I wouldn't do it. I invest and live in Raleigh as well, it's a competitive market but there are plenty of deals to be had, this does not sound like a deal at all. A few month's of vacancies, capex or tenant repairs and your wife's commission is wiped out. 


 Thanks man - I’m leaning towards the “don’t do it” side. I haven’t done as much residential and switched to commercial the past year and when presented with this the no money down hooked me a little. But, it is a net negative deal at least for several years with more risk and probably worth!


Where in the Raleigh area are you?

Quote from @Drew Sygit:
Quote from @Christopher Bell:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Christopher Bell have done several assumptions, land contracts, etc.

You state property value is $298k, but what is loan amount?
- What would the sellers walk-away with if they sold on market and paid agent commissions?

What will happen to property tax & home insurance amounts once you convert to a rental?

Even with 0% down, negative cashflow ONLY makes sense if something offsets it.

If the property has no equity, can't see any value-play.


 Tax and insurance would remain the same - Loan amount is $296k. If they sold with an agent they would walk away with about $280k. My wife is an agent and her getting the commission helping them buy another hose was attracting me because with the commission we get a rental for about the $280k with her commission so more/less below the market value. Plus the commission pads the negative equity for about 2-3 years (assuming 100% vacancy and self managing - which is tight).  

It does seem that the general consensus is that it's likely not a very good idea. There is a lot more risk than reward on this deal it appears. I just like the area, see a future in appreciation here, and thought being able to get an asset for $0.00 down and maybe tlose $300/mo in the long run might pan out in 3-5 years. I'm in a position were earning the 4-5% on the current cash can be utilized to offset that $300/mo loss in cashflow. 


 How are they going to walk away with $280K when they have a mortgage of $296k to payoff?

What is the property market value?

It appears they may have to bring money to closing to sell!

If so, why would you bail them out?

If they were to PAY YOU the $16k they'd need to bring to closing, to take it off their hands, NOW you might have something.

$16k / $300 negative cashflow/month = 53 months of the neg cashflow covered.

That's over 4 years. If YOU believe the property will apprecaite, and are willing to gamble on that belief, it MIGHT be worth it to proceed.


Drew, thanks for the input! They owe the $296k on the townhome. They don't have the money to bring to the table to sell the property. They are starting a family and want to move into a SFH and that's where using my wife to close on a new home would help offset the purchase. My assuming a $400k home (their price range) I could see myself offsetting that negative $300/mo for about 2-2.5 years depending on commission rate.

My gut does say there would be future appreciation and rent growth. The suburb of Raleigh is really growing. But, I’m just trying to be smart about it. 

Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Christopher Bell have done several assumptions, land contracts, etc.

You state property value is $298k, but what is loan amount?
- What would the sellers walk-away with if they sold on market and paid agent commissions?

What will happen to property tax & home insurance amounts once you convert to a rental?

Even with 0% down, negative cashflow ONLY makes sense if something offsets it.

If the property has no equity, can't see any value-play.


 Tax and insurance would remain the same - Loan amount is $296k. If they sold with an agent they would walk away with about $280k. My wife is an agent and her getting the commission helping them buy another hose was attracting me because with the commission we get a rental for about the $280k with her commission so more/less below the market value. Plus the commission pads the negative equity for about 2-3 years (assuming 100% vacancy and self managing - which is tight).  

It does seem that the general consensus is that it's likely not a very good idea. There is a lot more risk than reward on this deal it appears. I just like the area, see a future in appreciation here, and thought being able to get an asset for $0.00 down and maybe tlose $300/mo in the long run might pan out in 3-5 years. I'm in a position were earning the 4-5% on the current cash can be utilized to offset that $300/mo loss in cashflow. 

Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Christopher Bell:

I might be crazy but…..would you?

Scenario: 

Have a chance to assume a loan that has 28 years remaining, 5% interest, and in a very quickly growing suburb of Raleigh NC.

The townhouse would lose approximately $300/mo. Total payment is $2150/mo and market rent is $1850-$1900/mo. 

Loan assumption Is essentially at market value $298k, but the $0 down outside of closing cost on loan assumption are what’s hooking me. I can put 25% down and get a $300k Townhome to cashflow near 0.

Also, the family is looking to buy a SFH and would be using my wife (realtor) to buy. Therefore, we would make about $8000-$12000 in commissions from the purchase.

Am I crazy to be considering this? 

I don't see where you stated what you would do with the property

 LTR

Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Christopher Bell:

I might be crazy but…..would you?

Scenario: 

Have a chance to assume a loan that has 28 years remaining, 5% interest, and in a very quickly growing suburb of Raleigh NC.

The townhouse would lose approximately $300/mo. Total payment is $2150/mo and market rent is $1850-$1900/mo. 

Loan assumption Is essentially at market value $298k, but the $0 down outside of closing cost on loan assumption are what’s hooking me. I can put 25% down and get a $300k Townhome to cashflow near 0.

Also, the family is looking to buy a SFH and would be using my wife (realtor) to buy. Therefore, we would make about $8000-$12000 in commissions from the purchase.

Am I crazy to be considering this? 


 yes this makes no sense why you would buy a property at market value that is not cash flowing. If the deal was below market value then I would consider it, but what is the benefit?


 My thought would be to get a townhouse with a 5% interest rate, in the fastest growing county in NC, in the fastest growing town in that county, for no $ out of pocket. 

The benefit is that the area has a ton of growth here and might be a little speculative but there are billion dollar economic expansions happening in the town. 


Also, my wife gets to help them buy a home and recoup about $10-$12k from that.

Quote from @Bill B.:

Sorry, I misunderstood when I read this part 

“I can put 25% down and get a $300k Townhome to cashflow near 0.”

And thought you were assuming $225k on a $300k townhome.  

You could/should ask for at least 4-5% off if neither of you pays realtors commissions. If they sell to someone else they’d pay $12-$15k in commissions and only net $285-$288k.

If they owe near market value they’re really not in a position to sell. They must have put $0 down themselves or the market is falling and you may not want to buy there. They should have put at least 5% down and earned 4-6% in appreciation over a couple years. Giving them some 10% breathing space. 


 Bill,

Definitely should have been more clear with that sentence. There wouldn’t be any realtor commissions on the deal. My thought was going to be to ask them to pay any loan assumption costs. But could ask for some more off. 

You are 100% correct / they did put 0 down when they bought 2 years ago and do t have the room to sell. The area has a ton on economic development going on. The property is 5 minutes from my home and the fastest growing town in the fastest growing county in NC so I think there is future appreciation and increased rents down the road. 

The principal is $386/mo and the loss would be $302/mo


So you don’t think it would be a terrible idea to assume it? I could use the tax write offs too lol

Quote from @Bill B.:

So the plan is to earn NEGATIVE $300/mo on $75k instead of a positive $300/mo GUARANTEED return with a bank CD. IF, you self manage for free, and nothing breaks, and there’s zero vacancy?

Sounds like a great idea, with the best of intentions, what could possibly go wrong?

 I guess, if you were unemployed. and wanted to pay $600/mo to buy a job. As long as your crystal ball told you a tenant would move in day 1, stay for 7 years, and nothing would break. 

Don’t get me wrong. I’ve bought negative cashflow deals. But I paid under market, had a 15 year loan, included Managment fees, knew I could raise rent, values would rise, and I was negative less than the principle portion of my payment. 

 Bill, sorry no - I would put $0.00 down to assume it. 

Similar priced townhomes are about $300k and would require the 25% down. 

Also, it is a new construction home so likely very low CapEx. I would be self managing so would Buying a job in that aspect

I might be crazy but…..would you?

Scenario: 

Have a chance to assume a loan that has 28 years remaining, 5% interest, and in a very quickly growing suburb of Raleigh NC.

The townhouse would lose approximately $300/mo. Total payment is $2150/mo and market rent is $1850-$1900/mo. 

Loan assumption Is essentially at market value $298k, but the $0 down outside of closing cost on loan assumption are what’s hooking me. I can put 25% down and get a $300k Townhome to cashflow near 0.

Also, the family is looking to buy a SFH and would be using my wife (realtor) to buy. Therefore, we would make about $8000-$12000 in commissions from the purchase.

Am I crazy to be considering this? 

Man just saw this and wish I saw in advance! Hope it’s a great turnout! Would love to join the next!

Would love to attend the next one! I'll be traveling to Florida the 1st Tuesday of February. I'm in the area pretty regularly for work and looking to invest there! Would love to catch another event or plan something to grab brews at Waterline! Look forward to it!