Overall update. Lots 6/7/8/9/10 are sold. Although we took a $10,000 price reduction from List on every property, just so "we were working with them" we had increased the price about $20,000 across the board after we made the first sale and got the ball rolling.
Two of the lots dug wells at 90 feet and got 18 and 20 gallons per minute. A decent well is 8 to 10 gallons per minute. Part of our sales agreement is they must get a decent well. We have some wells going 300 feet in our county. If you ever do a well, do a Cistern well. Even if you get a Bad well of say 4 gallons per minute, the Cistern normally holds 1,500 gallons. You will never run out of water, even with a bad well GPM.
Once we decided to build a pond, we raised the price another $20,000 on those lots.
Forget whether the above was smart or not smart; originally underpriced or not; the take away is our area has virtually no houses for sale, and there are very few lots available in the surrounding farming community. That put more pressure on these lots which are available for market, on hard surface road (bmw/mercedes/harley no rocks and dust), near a 4 lane highway, 1 mile to town, yet in the country, and 5G coming through. Every time I call the broker, he thinks I'm going to raise the price again.

We live in Lot 5 which is below 4 and not listed, since we don't want to leave. We have artificially raised lots 1 and 4 to unreasonable levels, because we don't want anyone living in front of us or to the side. "BUT" decided to list in case someone decided they wanted. Lot 4 for example is 21 acres for $350,000. Its a great lot, but an unheard of price in our area. But $350,000 for 21 acres is chump change for people coming out of other markets, who want a great lot. Should we have listed? I decided since we are doing the work, put them out there.
Lots 2 and 3 are the only lots we really want to sell. Again all of this land has been paid for, thus no bank loan pushing us.
Lots2/3 do not have as good of a nature backdrop to them, but still great locations. I have done some easy/minor landscaping and will plant about 20 more evergreen trees this year, about 8 to 10 feet tall. Just really need to sit back and wait. Also 5 G will be coming through this fall.
If we wanted to, could go back and subdivide again and replat to 1 acre lots to lower the entry cost, but for more in total. Instead of $130,000 for 2.3 acres; could convert to two lots for $90,000 for 1 and 1.3 acres as an example. Less land, but lower entry point. Total dollars $130,000 versus re-subdivide $180,000.
Our county smallest lot is 2 acres, but we are within the 1 mile range for city rules, which would allow 1 acre lots.
Will hold off doing this play.
100% of the funds are going to our bank and paying down on Self Storage debt. Not holding out any for taxes, since we are building new Self Storage and doing year one write-offs on roads/fences/electric/security/etc to offset Subdivision profits.
Was this a good decision? Taking land purchased for $585 per acre or $7,000 per acre; selling for around $60,000. Paying off Self Storage debt at average 4.8% interest rate on 5 year term/20 year amort.
a. I don't see land/housing market to come back to this level at anytime soon in the future. Low interest, low inventory, high demand.
b. Don't see the land value from $585 or $7,000 up to $60,000 occurring again. It would have to go from $60,000 up $540,000 per acre to achieve the same return levels in the next 30 years.
c. Don't see my son both hitting the same market and also having the same Financial/RE skillset to do this project for another 20 years of maturing. If we decided to let him sale in the future.
d. Paying down debt with 4.8% interest rate on an asset like Self Storage that cash flows and funds itself is not a wise decision. REI is about leverage.
e. Basically we have taken an asset we did not need anymore, that we did not think would perform at a high level in the future and "convert" it to Self Storage which will outperform this land going forward.
f. This was really about Risk aversion. We had the land which is at a high level and the "needle" is pointed more towards a loss than higher gains. We had Self storage debt which was better "kept", but we did not want to move the Subdivision money to Stocks/Bonds or other investments where we did not feel a better than 4.8% after tax return was possible, or with less risk.
Forget whether we are right or wrong, this is our thought process and market evaluation. Luckily Self Storage is a very "liquid" fixed asset and can be converted to Cash very easily if we need it in the future. Plus we have taken care of the tax impact on the Subdivision land on our own timing.