Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Daniel Hennek

Daniel Hennek has started 0 posts and replied 217 times.

Post: Quicken Loans vs. traditional bank

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159
Originally posted by @Tim Johnson:

I'm a broker and we take loans to both places.  I actually like UWM better than quicken. Quicken has better pricing, I will give them that.  My processor actually prefers quicken because the new closing process at UWM is very timely and labor intensive.  UWM has better underwriters and they clear conditions faster.  If you have a good clean file both companies close them in 15 days.

They both have pros and cons and they are in my top 5 lenders to use.

There are lots of scenarios where UWM has better pricing.  They both are, to put it in laymen terms, manipulating the back end and having price wars.

Post: Quicken Loans vs. traditional bank

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:

Chris, I actually laughed out loud when I saw what the link was referencing!  There are some other fun reads if you start googling after this feud.

Post: Quicken Loans vs. traditional bank

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

What Melvin said.  A local broker is going to get you the best deal every time.  You're going to get way more experience and knowledge in almost any broker compared to a telemarketing "direct lender".

I've got extensive experience originating at 2 direct lenders, one bank and when I set up my own company I chose the broker channel after plenty of research.

Being a broker allows me to run a lower margin which results in lower rates.

That being said it's really all about the individual loan originator you work with. A great originator can shove a loan through a bad system and there are plenty out there at bad lenders. It's more likely though that you find the best originators working as brokers.

Go find a broker

Post: 203k Loan but DIY Rehab?

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

It would be mortgage fraud if you make a misrepresentation that is material to the transaction. Meaning, if HUD or your lender knew about your scheme they wouldn't approve the transaction. If you misrepresent facts that would affect a lenders decision to lend you money that is mortgage fraud.

Now, if you're buddy contractor hires you and oversees all the work and actually performs work as a contractor then it would be permissible. 

Post: New to House Hacking

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

1)) Do I need a new bank account to collect this rent?

No

2) Lease ends 3/31/20 what contracts do I need to keep them in there with a rent increase?

Just a new lease that they sign.  People don't want to move usually but you still want to be careful with any rent increase.  Be sure that it's justified and that you can get your tenants to agree to it.

3) what other things would I need immediately that I wouldn't in a single family?

Not sure what you're asking here.  Be more specific

4). In case they want to leave, how would I go about getting a credit check or screen a potential tenant?

You can get credit reports when people authorize you to do so and I wouldn't rent to anyone refusing a credit check.  Some companies will help with background checks and credit reports you just need to find your preferred vendor.

Post: Property under contract. Private/hard money recommendations?

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

"due to other financial endeavors"? 

Real private money lenders know how to do basic math and determine when and how their money is going to be tied up.  It's some pretty bad basic accounting to have a situation where they commit to your deal then just don't have the money for you anymore.

There are plenty of other private money lenders out there you.  Start putting in the time to find them.  And vet them better this time so you don't get another lender without enough capital to commit to a deal.

Post: Any lenders funding under $50,000?

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

Very few.

Best bet is a smaller institution within the community most likely.  This has historically been a niche that very few lenders are willing to fill.  I'd start my search with local credit unions or community banks.  It might be a long search. Good luck.

Post: Why would a seller not accept an FHA loan?

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

I was throwing around google search terms looking for some perspectives on FHA financing and this post came up so I figured I would resurrect it and add some clarification on certain points so anyone else finding this can have accurate information.

Does an FHA appraisal "stick with the property"?

Yes, BUT only for FHA loans. When people have mentioned that in this thread they failed to make the distinction that the appraisal only "sticks" if the new buyer is getting an FHA loan also. It's been said that if you get an FHA loan it's a risk because it could "devalue" a property for up to 6 months and it has to be noted that the FHA appraisal value would only apply for a new buyer getting an FHA loan because FHA case numbers expire in 6 months. So, if someone gets a conventional loan then there is a new appraisal ordered and you wouldn't use any FHA appraisal previously completed.

If this puts a seller in a bind it's only in the case where the new buyer is going with FHA. Furthermore, if an appraiser says the property is worth $50,000 less than what it's listed for there is a reason. There are very few agents that have a better opinion of value and do more work determining that opinion than a certified real estate appraiser, which is why lenders require an independent, unbiased, 3rd party to do the work. I've had plenty of agents want to argue with me about a low appraisal and only a handful even try to do the work to provide actual evidence of why the appraised value is incorrect; you usually get a bunch of bellyaching and complaining but not much evidence to justify a value increase. Some agents try to provide proof and 99% of the time the appraiser's information is more accurate. Most of the time it's just that the agents are insulted, worried about the deal going through, they look bad to their clients that they got the value wrong by such a large margin, and the appraiser is basically calling them out on it. I've been pissed about appraisals before too; when I was just starting out I remember trying to challenge a few myself. Then I learned how to actually do the analysis the appraiser is doing and what guidelines are restricting that analysis. After a few hundred you begin to trust the analysis more than any real estate agent's valuation. A property is worth what someone will pay for it, I get that but it really only applies to cash deals that don't involve other people's money. If you want to set a new value with your cash go right ahead but if you're using other people's money they are the ones typically setting value.

As far as comments about FHA not going through or having problems closing you can put that all on the particular loan officer involved and their management not doing good enough quality control. QC is becoming a bigger and bigger issue as the cost of origination increases. If you have a lender not informing people that a deal isn't closing until 3 days before closing that is an issue the lender created. This is not specific to FHA and happens across all loan types with unprofessional "professionals". Many mortgage companies and MLOs are just bad at their jobs in general, like many real estate agents. People are people, real estate transactions are more complicated than collecting a commission and the barrier to entry just isn't that high for a 'salesperson' level license in real estate or mortgages. They didn't tell you until 3 days before closing because they are just bad at their jobs, don't knock FHA for that.

FHA is the whoops loan? I've heard this before. Again, there are borrowers that are borderline for any deal. This is not specific to FHA. If you've got a qualifying credit score 3 points above the threshold then it's the MLOs responsibility to properly coach their borrower through the next few months in finding a property. Proper coaching is key for most loans. Many of you would be surprised how many people do silly things like go out and finance a new car before closing so they can have a sweet new ride to go with their house. If you know how the process works inside and out then you can give people some pointers that will help in a variety of ways. MLOs should know these things but most don't and there again it comes down to people not being very good at their jobs and/or being inexperienced.

FHA loans are somewhere around 20% of the mortgage market in total. Roughly 80% of those are first time buyers. The FHA is a great program for a variety of reasons and nobody should be basing whether or not they take a deal strictly on whether or not it's financed by an FHA backed mortgage. Being financed by an FHA mortgage should be considered the same as financing with any type of mortgage because the confidence level in the financing going through should be based on the MLO and company involved and not the product type.

Post: Pay off the property soonest or buy new asset ?

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

It's just a question of math.

How much are you making, how often do you have to make moves with assets and how much do those moves cost you in time and money.

In very basic terms, whatever you pay down at 6.75% will guarantee you a return on your investment of 6.75%. Not paying 6.75% is the same as making 6.75% tax implications aside

Are you going to make more than 6.75% on another deal? Possibly, and once you factor in time and work to that deal is your effective return from that deal the same as 6.75% in passive income or savings?

Passive 6.75 is pretty nice.  Doing real estate deals is not passive income, you're working for it.  Mortgage money is available because many people with assets like having stable investments.  You should start thinking of why they're so happy to have you paying them 6.75%.

Post: New Jersey Duplex Owner Fininancing Help!!!

Daniel HennekPosted
  • Lender
  • Lewis, CO
  • Posts 218
  • Votes 159

You'll find out the value by getting an independent appraiser to appraise the property.  They will make adjustments based on condition.  For a duplex  you're probably looking around $500-600 or so depending on the area.

If she doesn't want to do the owner financing then you're going to be stuck looking at the private/hard money market referred to in the mortgage industry and Non-QM (non-qualified mortgages).  Many investors will lend on deals like this where a history of rent can be established, you don't have to meet all the agency requirements that you did for your other loan.  The rates and fees are going to be quite a bit higher.  Talking to a local mortgage broker can get you started in the right direction usually.