Originally posted by @Anthony Rivera:
Many posts indictate that if the tenant moves out, the landlord must return all remaining pre-paid rent. That doesn't apply if the tenant breaks the lease and is responsible for the remainder of the rent due under the lease agreement, or 2 months rent, depending on whether there is an early termination addendum. Am I wrong?
I have a applicant for my $1300/mo rental in a senior community, who has a 720 credit score, is 58, retired, has savings from a home sale, and has a pension of $750/mo, and is offering a full year, plus security dep, up front. Thoughts on this and above?
Back up...they are not responsible for the remainder of the rent. Find a local attorney who is versed in landlord tenant law for your state and get their input because I'm only knowledgeable about mine. If you get pulled into small claims by a tenant who wants their "xtra" rent back, most likely a judge will ignore what you have in your lease regarding money owed, breaches etc. and look to you to explain what you have done and are doing since the move out to re-rent the property as fast as possible. Ok? Read that again. Now, if you are re-renting or making every effort, the judge will not let you keep all the rent. One, two months max is usual and customary.....even in a crappy (slow) market. It would be called 'unjustified enrichment' to allow that to happen if you were holding several months rent that was unearned and sitting on a vacant or even worse, a newly occupied with a replacement tenant. How much will you keep....I don't know. It depends on the circumstances and situation, but you are not in the driver's seat.
As one other response shared, any rent in hand beyond the security deposit and first month (+last if your state law permits) is not income in hand until the accrual transfers one month rent from the xtra security deposit account into the rent received account. This is not a paper xfer but an actual transfer from an interest bearing account for that specific pile of money (not to be co-mingled with another tenant's deposit) into your operating funds account. Do most landlords set themselves up this way...probably not. But your first trip to the IRS will set you straight ... tute sweet. The interest belongs to the tenant, not the landlord! It becomes a proportioned distribution based on security deposit funds used for end of lease operations based on damages and general chargables. If half is used for rehab prior to re-renting...then you split the interest earned 50/50. You need to ask yourself if you are up for all the record keeping.
You also need to ask the obvious...what else is a prospective tenant paying up front in advance...their car payments? Not likely. Their credit card bills....not likely. Groceries, gasoline, utilities? You know why...there's not a single advantage to freezing their money into someone else's account without access to it. So on face, my friend, there's no advantage to either party...so why do it? WIFM= what's in it for me?