Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Francis A.

Francis A. has started 106 posts and replied 332 times.

Post: Title Company

Francis A.Posted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 352
  • Votes 142

http://pacificescrowinc.com

Thanks for the article! 

It seems to boil down to this"

"Officials focused on structures built before 1978 with at least two stories and at least five units. The city's housing department provided addresses of 29,226 apartment buildings constructed before 1978."

At first blush without the aid of total units available the Los angeles area, 29,000 + or so buildings may not be as much as I thought where the Los Angeles area is concerned.

That being said, if there were ever a time to be poised to grab a 5 unit multi family building at conditions favorable, the time is coming starting February. I am curious to see all the buildings earmarked and which zip codes  they're located in. 

This could end up being the unofficial "phase 1" of this project as I'm sure there are smaller multi families out there that would need this treatment. 

I also read somewhere that Oklahoma is now ahead of California in terms of the potential  threat of earthquakes striking. 

All in all, nice post!

Post: 20% down on investment properties??

Francis A.Posted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 352
  • Votes 142
Originally posted by @Logan Drew:
Originally posted by @Francis A.:

@Jose Quintana

@Matt Lefebvre is correct with regards to the FHA solution. That's how I got into my first duplex. The interesting thing is that I was informed by my loan guy that I would do the same thing if I wanted to move into an SFR. Furthermore, I've seen SFR's that are technically duplexes as in 2 free standing buildings on one lot. All legal.

If you have the money and would rather get into the place that you've vetted as best you can, you can move in for 6 months and then rent out the place. 

Or you can trying other alternative ways to finance this place. Only thing is, the building you're looking at might be gone when you finally sort out your "alternative" financing. 

I am also facing with the 20% conundrum. The way I see it, partnerships are the best way forward from my end.

Choice, choices, choices!

FHA guidelines require the owner-occupant live in the property for 12 mos after closing an FHA loan (as owner-occupied). That said, it's more of an ethical question than a legal one sometimes as I don't think HUD will notice if someone used an FHA loan to buy a home and moves on to something else in 6 months. I would, however, plan to abide by the laws/ guidelines in place. You do certify you will live in the home/ unit for 12 months when you use an FHA loan to obtain a property.

  Yes. 12 months, not 6 months. Either way it's a great way to get going. Make no mistake about it. The potential or existing income from the extra unit will will factored when you apply for the loan. A huge plus.

Post: 20% down on investment properties??

Francis A.Posted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 352
  • Votes 142

@Jose Quintana

@Matt Lefebvre is correct with regards to the FHA solution. That's how I got into my first duplex. The interesting thing is that I was informed by my loan guy that I would do the same thing if I wanted to move into an SFR. Furthermore, I've seen SFR's that are technically duplexes as in 2 free standing buildings on one lot. All legal.

If you have the money and would rather get into the place that you've vetted as best you can, you can move in for 6 months and then rent out the place. 

Or you can trying other alternative ways to finance this place. Only thing is, the building you're looking at might be gone when you finally sort out your "alternative" financing. 

I am also facing with the 20% conundrum. The way I see it, partnerships are the best way forward from my end.

Choice, choices, choices!

Have you checked with your bank about accepting rent checks (with a pre approved deposit slip? An email will be shot out to you as soon as the money hits. 

Wells Fargo will allow you to have them come in with a deposit slip to pay rents. I don't see too many branches in Atlanta though.

I would look your bank. Specifically check out the closest branch (to your rental)  and have them set a simple system (pre approved deposit slip) up for you. They will be only too happy to assist you. 

And selling point to your tenants? They too benefit by becoming regular faces at this particular branch. A time will come when they'll need a friendly face to vouch for them when the time comes for them to seek financial services. And bank hours shouldn't be an issue. I'm sure a deposit box type arrangement can be arranged or they can always go in on a Saturday, pay their rent and make friendly with their local bankers. Give it a shot!

Originally posted by @Ravi P.:

There are quite a few in the Berklee College of Music area of Boston, most have existed for decades. I'd imagine it's not easy to make money on them since most of your clients aren't wealthy are doing it for love of the craft. the real money would be in building out these theater or studio spaces, but as a rental you won't expect great upswings in your cash flow but you would be likely immune to downturns in the market

 Interesting. If the ones by Berklee have existed for decades, that could mean (barring refi-ing etc), the underlying mortgages might have been paid off? That's a toss up.

The ones in Los Angeles (downtown, Glendale, Hollywood etc) some old some newer tend to be booked for months on end and the weekly rentals aren't exactly chump change.   That's where the curiosity is coming from. 

Does anyone own and or manage such a property. specifically for music and/or theater?

Trying to learn more about any experience regarding the numbers and general upside / downside of the "managing the people" part of business. Thanks!

Post: Flipping Frenzy Grips Sydney, Spurring Warnings of Housing Risks

Francis A.Posted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 352
  • Votes 142

Corrollaries and lessons to be learned? Interesting what's going on across the pond in our area of interest. 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-12/flipping-frenzy-grips-sydney-spurring-warnings-of-housing-risks

Post: CPA

Francis A.Posted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 352
  • Votes 142

Here you go...  right down the street from you and a contributor to Biggerpockets. 

http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2013/12/19...

http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/author/ama...

@Amanda Han