Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Garry Miller:
Quote from @Mike Grudzien:
Garry,
I'm surprised that working at this level of real estate development and deal size that you and your partners don't have at least a dozen lenders in your back pocket that deal at that level and like your work....
I'm interested in seeing the answers here.
Great question - we've had a lot of success with these not quite dozen, but 7 lenders and they're all in on their respective deals to finance the Vertical construction, secured by the housing assets yet to be built. This request is for a short term, construction/bridge loan so we can get through the infrastructure phase only. More transparently - it gets us out of the land bank holding phase now. Available cash is servicing the debt, with construction partners on the sideline waiting to be put to work. Thanks for the clarifying questions - I hope this opens up some more perspectives about how to solve for this opportunity!
1. You’re trying to replace equity you don’t have with debt. The “horizontal”construction, while sometimes can be partially financed by debt depending on developer track record, is more often regarded as the “skin” in the game put in by developer either theirselves or thru a syndicated equity offering. I get requests for this kind of financing all the time from mortgage brokers who don’t understand the equity / debt relationship.
2. Texas is somewhat unique in that a bond can be issued which will cover some of the cost of the infrastructure development. The bond will be paid by an improvement district tax paid for by the property owners.Their are two underwriters who handle these type of bonds. However, qualification is quite difficult because the underwriters are selling these bonds to their longtime clients and excessive defaults will kill their business. The first thing the underwriters consider is the financial position of the developer. Unless that’s solid they will go no further. Secondly they require the developer to place 25% of the bond issue amount in escrow, so for a $20 million bond issue that’s $5 million. Then if the total does not cover full infrastructure development they require a plan that covers the additional amount required.
The particular development I’m involved in spent about $400,000 on soft costs to be able to provide the necessary information to the underwriter - this was in addition to all other soft costs usually incurred in development.
Great discussion.. Bond financing while it works in my experience is time consuming and like you said expensive.. I did 4 of them in CA back in the day.. 1915 act and Mello roos. these were late 80s and even back then the Mello Roos one I did in Nevada county Ca the soft cost were in excess of 250k U had to have very expensive appraisal you had to pay bond council and then you had the investment bankers who sold the bonds. The one I did in Nevada county was the first one they ever did in that county.. But today Mello Roos is very widly used in CA. and Frankly one of the only ways developers can get these deals done as the cash needs for infrastructure and offsites is just so high they need this added leverage.
Oregon has Bond issues but only the cities or counties can use them private developers cannot expect for rare instances.. This makes development in our area very tough for guys like me that are not publicly traded or a large regional developer.. so the public companies and the large regional have kicked all us little guys to the curb basically. I can get horizontal for my projects but my commercial bank requires the dirt to be paid for and these are multi decade connections along with substantial deposit relationships..
I think Garry might want to consider phasing this into as small of chunks as possible trying to land one huge loan is pretty tough.
Well said team, this is progressing nicely. I appreciate the insight both of you have shared @Jay Hinrichs and @Don Konipol. We've been able to rework this in to phases and lower the financing needed to move forward with Horizontal work, around a 7M bridge loan, that keeps the equity table a little more balanced. I've sent you both an email with more details, and would be glad to reach out for more guidance in the future!