It has been a little while since I've provided an update so I thought now would be a good time. I currently own four SFH in the Atlanta Metro area and am in the process of trying to acquire a SFH in the Cleveland Metro area via Roofstock. All the numbers worked pretty much as expected based on my initial computations.
- Lithonia, GA: This was the first SFH I purchased through Roofstock. Aside from initial work needed to be done which has been discussed in prior posts I've had no maintenance items at this property. In July 2018 the tenants did not pay the rent which resulted in the filing for eviction. This prompted the tenants to pay the July rent. However it resulted in legal fees. As of right now the August 2018 rent has not been paid, but sometimes it takes a few days before it registers on the owner's interface on the property management site.
- Villa Rica, GA: This was the second SFH I purchased through Roofstock. Aside from initial work done and additional work stemming from having the septic tank inspected there have been no maintenance items at this property. The tenants have been paying every month.
- Canton, GA: This SFH was purchased outside of Roofstock using an agent from the property management company. Aside from initial work done there was an issue with the garbage disposal unit which was addressed back in June. The tenants had renewed their lease back in December 2017 but have recently given notice to leave early at the end of September. The tenants have been paying every month.
- Dacula, GA: This was the third SFH purchased through Roofstock. No work has been done to the property after purchase. The tenants have been paying every month.
-Euclid, OH: I'm trying to purchase a property through Roofstock but have been having some issues. We came to an agreement on purchase price back on July 17th. After that the Roofstock Transaction Coordinator told me that the seller was requesting that I pay for an item at closing that was the seller's responsibility as per the PSA posted in Roofstock's diligence vault. However, after I raised skepticism over the request Roofstock offered to credit me the market place fee at closing which comes out to be a little more than the requested item. This did bother me though because after a sale price is agreed upon there is no discussion on Roofstock's website that the PSA terms are now negotiable. Technically I suppose everything is negotiable but the point of Roofstock is to simplify the entire process so if that was a seller requirement then the posted PSA should reflect that. I was sent the PSA back on July 24th and the seller did not fill out the Ohio Disclosure form. This was a red flag to me. Remember that Roofstock is the agent of the seller, not the buyer, but even so, as a customer with Roofstock I believe they should have reviewed the disclosure sent by the seller which didn't answer the questions presented and sent it back. I told the Roofstock Transaction Coordinator that the deal could not move forward if the seller would not fill out the disclosures. I received updated disclosures today, August 2nd, which revealed a prior issue at the property that the seller had addressed. Several questions were still not answered. So I informed Roofstock that they needed to be addressed. However, the entire thing comes off very shady and unprofessional. At this point I'm skeptical this deal will even move forward.