Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jonathan Twombly

Jonathan Twombly has started 34 posts and replied 698 times.

Post: Operating under a LLC??

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Hunter Thompson  Absolutely.  Each entity is legally separate.  If you commingle the funds from entities in any way, you jeopardize their legal separateness, which could potentially lead a court to disregard the LLCs and make all the assets attachable.  You need to keep separate books, have separate accounts, and be very strict about maintaining the separateness.  You definitely need to hire a good accounting firm to keep the books, or hire a management company that will keep everything in good order.

Post: Fundraising $250k+ per investor

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Taylor Vick  Seems like a pretty tried and true strategy.  To expand beyond the circle of affluent people down in Greenville, perhaps you want to start doing social media and SEO to begin to attract people into your platform who don't live in your area.  As you probably know, you cannot solicit them for deals until you establish a relationship, but you can get the relationship part started if you have an inbound lead marketing strategy to collect more leads.  Then you could hold online webinars to discuss what you are doing.  Just take your in person strategy online!

Post: Operating under a LLC??

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Hunter Thompson I'm not sure what you are referring to, exactly.  But here's how we do it.  The asset management company has no ownership interest in the property LLCs.  It's connection is through an asset management agreement with the property.  The asset management company collects asset management fees from the properties in exchange for overseeing them.

The holding company has B shares in the property LLC. (The investors have A shares, which allow them to collect their preferred interest. We need two classes of shares to delineate between who receives priority in the distribution of proceeds.) The holding company receives its share of profits from the properties, assuming there is any left over when the preferred returns are paid out.

Hope that answers the question.

Post: Is the Multifamily Market Correcting?

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Andrew Johnson  The NREI article actually talks about what you are seeing - few properties on the market, at high prices.  Interesting that you are seeing them stay on the market without moving.  What I am seeing (and hearing from friends) is the experience of being constantly outbid, with ridiculous offers, on properties they are trying to acquire.

Post: Operating under a LLC??

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Hunter Thompson This is how we do it. Each property is in a separate "single-purpose entity" that is an LLC. The lenders actually require us to do it this way. Then we have an LLC for our asset management firm, which oversees each property and a separate LLC that is a holding company for our promoted interest/carried interest on each deal. We also have dropped LLCs below the holding company (i.e., they are wholly owned by the holding company) for our real estate brokerage firm and our media company.

Post: Fundraising $250k+ per investor

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Taylor Vick  It's impressive what you have done so far.  Would you share your methods now so people don't repeat what you're already doing?

Post: Is the Multifamily Market Correcting?

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

Two articles that appeared in the trade press yesterday suggest that it may be happening.

First, in Globe Street, there appeared an article called "In Volume Dropoff, It's 2017, Not 2007."

This article cited a Real Capital Analytics report suggesting that commercial real estate investment sales in 2Q 2017 were 5% less than in the same quarter of 2016. In addition, investment volume is now 13% lower than at the peak of this cycle in 4Q 2015. However, the authors argue that a 2007-style crash is not happening. In 2007, six quarters after the peak, sales volume was down by 83%. That's 70 points higher than in the current cycle. So, perhaps we are heading for a soft landing.

In the other article, "Pullback Continues in the Investment Sales Market for Apartment Properties," in National Real Estate Investor, the article argues that "sales of single properties are slowing, suggesting broad correction in the market." In that article, it suggested that things are actually worse than they seem, because much of the soft volume was actually contributed by the sale of a single huge portfolio. Without that sale, volume would have been even lower. The article suggests that what we are seeing is simply a normal "reversion to historical norms," meaning in English a normal correction.

What's your view? What are you seeing in the markets where you're active? Is volume as strong as ever? Or is it tailing off?

Post: Pooling money for down payment

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

Please PM me.  @Account Closed

Post: Are RE investors in Los Angeles crazy, stupid or know a secret?

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260

@Chris Co  The dollar is cheap because foreign investors are NOT buying. That's what causes it to drop. Of course, when the dollar is low that will cause some investors to view US assets as cheap and to come back into the market again. Enough of them come back and the dollar will rise again.  

Of course there could be other factors involved in currency fluctuations.  But in general if the dollar is high it's because foreigners think this is a desirable market to invest in and they are demanding a lot of US assets.  

Post: Are RE investors in Los Angeles crazy, stupid or know a secret?

Jonathan TwomblyPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 1,260
Originally posted by @Matt R.:
Originally posted by @Jonathan Twombly:
Originally posted by @Matt R.:
Originally posted by @Jonathan Twombly:
Originally posted by @Matt R.:

And the best city in the world to invest in real estate is...

Los Angeles.

 There is almost always a problem with top ten lists like this.  First, they are usually marketing pieces, designed to get clicks.  Second, they are aimed at casual investors who don't want or need to think about how to actually make money in real estate.  In this case, this chart was prepared by an asset management firm looking for passive investors in a fund.  So it designed a really casual ranking - because people love rankings - and a flashy graphic.  

When you look at the "report," which is hardly academic at all, it ranks six factors for "best".  At least three of those factors are basically measures of "bigness" - population over 15; metro GDP; and retail sales.  

None of the factors considered are ones that investors look at - population growth (not just population); job growth; or supply and demand.  Cap rates are not mentioned.  

One factor on the list is income - not income growth or income relative to rents, just income.  So what?  Affordability is critical if you want to raise rents, not absolute income.  You want to see that rents are low relative to median income, so you know that you can raise them.  In major cities, despite high incomes, huge increases in rents relative to incomes have left landlords in a position of not being able to push rent increases anymore. In addition, the construction boom in the major cities has increased supply of apartments for high income earners dramatically.  

I don't know what's going on in LA, but here in New York, there is a glut of apartments on the market, rent growth has topped out, and landlords are offering concessions.  I see for sale and for rent signs as I walk around my "hot" neighborhood in Brooklyn.  I have not seen those since the Great Recession.   Yet, this list ranks New York as Number 5 on the list.  

Everyone on this site should ignore all lists of hot markets, top ten markets, etc.   They are not aimed at you.  They are marketing pieces aimed at journalists who will pick them up for stories because their cities made the list.  This one did its job.  If you google it, you can see it got picked up by a lot of journalists, most of whom have no clue how real estate investing actually works.  But "our city is number one in the world!!!" is a great headline and an easy story to write to get more clicks to your website.  

Right on. I agree and you have to always consider the source. That Schroders source is with Oxford University and I think it was more of a follow the global investor money type list.

Here is what Marcus Millichap says and may be more relative for some.

Los Angeles is now the top city in Marcus & Millichap’s National Multifamily Index (NMI), moving up 11 spots from a year earlier (see below). The move was fueled by a forecast for further tightening in vacancy and minimal supply growth. Robust job growth pushed Seattle-Tacoma seven spots higher to place second on the list.

Although apartment construction this year will reach its highest level in more than 30 years, the report says, it remains below its 1980s peak when baby boomers were coming of age. Demand is expected to largely keep pace, Marcus & Millichap reported.

The NMI ranks 46 major markets according to a collection of 12-month, forward-looking economic indicators and supply-and-demand variables. It was published in Marcus & Milichap’s “2017 U.S. Multifamily Investment Forecast.

2017 National Multifamily Index

(Marcus & Millichap)

 Seems like a better source than that Schroeders list!  Thanks.

 Understandable. Schroders is no joke still, been around since 1804, over 4000 employees, over 300 billion in assets etc...we can imagine what their client list looks like in terms of wealth. Anyways they are serious investors to say the least. 

 No doubt they are.  But my point is that this is marketing materials aimed at investors in their funds, who really don't know much about real estate, but this confirms all their biases - they like big cities and important universities.  Relying on marketing materials for guidance on the market is not the best idea, and clearly you seem to be someone who understands that.  But I am afraid a lot of people do not.  So many people on this site are chasing "hot" markets, and it's really not the best way to invest, IMHO.