Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Lee S.

Lee S. has started 38 posts and replied 583 times.

Post: avoiding 6 month seasoning requirement

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

These rules are just ridiculous, I would like to slap the idiots that wrote them.

Post: avoiding 6 month seasoning requirement

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

it's a rule if they want to sell the loan, if they keep their loans then they can make whatever rules they want.  

Post: Discouraged. Direct mail isn't working.

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

@Justin Silverio yes, I know what you're saying here and I don't disagree.  I'm starting to suspect it's an issue.

I'm very good at building raport with sellers, I was a practicing doctor for a decade.

Post: Discouraged. Direct mail isn't working.

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

@Justin Silverio I agree with what you're saying but let me clarify what the call center does.  They are not negotiating for me, they are taking down initial basic information then they set an appt for me to call back and negotiate with anyone that indicates they do have a house they want to sell.

yes, I'm concerned that some potential deals are also getting screened out, this is what i was referring to.

Post: Discouraged. Direct mail isn't working.

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

@Justin Silverio I'm using the call center to free up my time and I'm not able to answer the calls live a majority of the time.  Voice mail worked fine in the past, thought I would try out the call center for a while and see how it works out.  I'm concerned it's saving me too much time having only talked to 5 out of 50 calls, not to mention my response rate hasn't been horrible.  

I was expecting 3-5x the call volumne I've received so far. I'm currently mailing every single NOO house in two zip codes with 30% equity or more and also mailing all owner occupied in one and a good % in the other. I do understand owner occupied will get a lower response rate, however, compared to past mailings I'm getting maybe 1/4 the response rate. The fact that I'm mailing every address means I would automatically catch houses that need would only be found on more difficult to get lists.

I know stopping is the worst thing I could do.  I'm planning on using the Michael Quarles 6 month system of a different mail piece each time, hopefully it picks up.  I'm going to need 2 deals minimum to make it worth my time and $.

Post: Discouraged. Direct mail isn't working.

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

@Claire Trammell my recent mailings have been terrible also.  Im using Michaels call center, im concerned their process is costing me potential deals?  I've sent out 4000 post cards and 2000 yellow letters in the last 6-8 weeks and I've received 40-50 calls but only spoke to 5 unmotivated people after the call center screened them.  Not sure how to proceed.  

I had much better success last year, sent out a total of -3500 post cards, sent to voice mail and returned calls.  I ended up with two great deals that I Rehabbed and rented.

Post: 15.6 MW Solar Power $46,000 question

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

@Charlie Price go for it, I like what you're doing and you have clearly put some thought into it.  I get a little testy when the uninformed start giving opinions on the net.  Your numbers are fine, my 8kw system cost 27k (19,700 after tax credit).  No regrets, never want to be without solar moving forward.  I plan to turn my current primary into a rental in the future, I plan to get extra rent for it even if I have to clarify rent as $2500 and power is a separate $200 or whatever. My system will replace about ~$300 a month in energy bills.

Post: Want a HELOC what is the best Bank?

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444

google, you will find plenty.  Wells Fargo sucks, I bank with them for the last 20 years and just replaced the heloc I had with them with one from a non local credit union.  Higher ltv, lower interest rate.

Post: 15.6 MW Solar Power $46,000 question

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444
Originally posted by @Joseph Gozlan:

@Charlie Price a few things to think about:

1) search RUBS on the forums or google. You don't need sub-meters to implement a RUBS system. Make sure you match your competition though because if you'll be the only property that implemented RUBS and still charge the same rents, you'll have a challenge leasing the units. 

2) solar panels have a diminished rate of return. The effectiveness of the cells is reduced over time and will not provide as much energy 10 years from now as they would today. 

3) don't assume everything will be peachy. Solar systems requires maintenance as well so calculate that into your opex (so your NOI won't grow that much).

4) make sure not to oversize the solar system because you will have vacancy and electric consumption won't always be at full capacity. 

5) if you DO oversize it, see if your local electricity company buy back overages of electricity generated by your system. It requires installing specific panels that facilitate the reverse flow. 

6) solar panels make roof maintenance more complicated so keep that in mind. 

7) solar systems will have different outputs depending on location, direction and climate. If you live in Boston and your roofs face the wrong way, the same system will generate a lot less electricity than in Texas or Arizona. 

Lastly, while some people see that as an asset, there will be some that will be concerned about buying your propert for all of the above reasons. 

Responses to your points:

2) yes solar panels output diminishes over time, almost all are guaranteed to be producing a minimum of 80% of their initial output at year 25, twenty years after they already paid for themselves and they will continue to produce for many decades.

3) inverters are typically warrantied for 10 years, again, long after they already paid for themselves.  My system has not been touched in 6 years.  No moving parts, almost zero maintenance over their lifetime.

5) most do, mine does. Panel type has nothing to do with selling power back to power company. You technically give all your power back to the grid, you can't run your house off of a solar system when the power is out (without a backup battery system due to variability of solar output).

6) I wouldn't install on an old roof, no issues otherwise.

7) solar company will discuss location and output before instillation, non issue.  Micro inverters allow each panel to work to full capacity and won't be pulled down by an adjacent shaded panel. 

*you clearly know nothing about solar and have spent no time doing the math.  People are fools to not buy a property with a paid for solar system for the rate arbitrage alone.  Home loan 5%, solar return 15%, get extra home loan to pay for higher value of solar house and pocket the difference.  YOU LITERALLY GET PAID TO BUY A SOLAR HOUSE/BUILDING.

Post: Any turnkey providers helping with BRRR Strategy?

Lee S.Posted
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 674
  • Votes 444
Originally posted by @Larry Fried:

@Lee S.  Well in your example of course it would be better, but those differences don't always work out as you laid them out - not by a long shot from what I've seen.  To clarify, I should have said that the investor is taking on more risk upfront.

Right, but this would be an issue of bad up front analysis and not the BRRRR strategy at fault. My last two I did I ended up with 150k in equity and will have all my initial investment refinanced out in 2-3 months, im waiting on seasoning on number 2. Number 1 came in after rehab at 65% ARV, already refinanced.