Marc Faulkner Dion DePaoli Bill Gulley
The question about my prerogative to accept a lower payoff amount (re jumbo loan limit) got me thinking more about the parts of this I do have control over. Which brings me to a question: Should I consider making the borrower an offer on the home? Follow my reasoning below and please give me your opinions:
Fact: Because of the borrower's likely inability to refinance, there is a very high probability that I will be tied to this borrower and this property until the note matures in December 2019 (or until very close to that time).
Fact: The house is more likely to appreciate in value over the next 6 years if improvements are made to it, such as a remodel to the 1970s kitchen and better outfitting of the downstairs apartment. (The borrower has no means to make any such improvements, but I have rehabbed two houses now, and I have the knowhow as well as the means to do it bit by bit if I plan/budget ahead.)
Fact: The borrower's main motivation in buying was to get to stay in the house until his daughter is 18--for a fixed monthly payment lower than the rent he was paying. (I'm sure he'd love to harvest some appreciation, but I have observed him in this financial relationship to be more about short-term thinking and instant relief from pressures than about any sort of investment mindset.)
Fact: I am in the midst of selling two of my properties (with closings coming up this week and July 2)--and I am about to have a lot of liquidity until I reinvest. I could use that liquidity to buy the place and pay myself off--thus doing away with the note, which we all seem to agree is sketchy, unsaleable, and in all respects not all that desirable to own.
So...I'm just wondering whether I might find a way to make all of this better for myself financially by simply doing away with that note by making him an offer on the home that would address his main motivations. For example, I could offer him a 2-year lease at a rent that factors in insurance/taxes--with the option to add on a year at a time, based on his payment performance. He does take good care of the home, so I don't have concerns about him as a caretaker. I could, for probably 5-7K, make that downstairs apartment nicer and more private/attractive. Thus, I could take control of the place as (sort of) a duplex property and find a good stable professional to rent the downstairs and thus mitigate some of my risk with my friend's financial instability.
I would turn the property over to a property manager right away.
And I would not have to worry about the borrower timing the sale of the house properly come 2019.
Obviously, there are cons to this plan--and I know I'd need advice on how to structure the transaction and what the tax implications would be. And any offer I'd make would have the normal contingency clauses built in for appraisal and home/termite/radon inspections. But could this perhaps be a better solution than merely turning the mortgage management over to a servicing company? I'd at least get the appreciation on the home--and would be much, much less at the mercy of the borrower's financial ups and downs.
Thoughts?