Quote from @Jennifer Rysdam:
The big difference for me was that NREIG's quote said that they would only cover what I currently have invested in the flip. My State Farm quote (who I have my personal stuff with too) came in at the same premium amount and will insure at 100% of replacement/rebuild. Here's why that's a great deal:
I'm insuring a 1915 two story 3/2 that I just bought for $52,500. I plan on putting about $30,000 into it and selling it somewhere between $120,000 and $150,000. State Farm sets the replacement/rebuild value at $253,000. For $98 per month I'd say that's a sweet deal! They'll rebuild the thing instead of just giving me back what I have into it.
State Farm for the win this time :)
(I have to add that I didn't go through them for my 8-plex because they were much higher than Berkshire Hathaway Guard.)
This may sound harsh but that is not my intention at all.
I have bad news for you - regardless of what your agent told you SF will not insure vacant/rehab properties. I know this because my agency regularly gets referred these type of properties to insure for local SF agents. My handshake deal with them is once the rehab is done (and if it will be a landlord property) I will not take the landlord policy business and they take it back as a SF landlord policy.
Beyond SF no carriers will insure a vacant/rehab property at full replacement cost coverage which is double the proof of the policy being on junk paper. The agent, if aware of your property being vacant/under rehab is doing an intentional misrepresentation on an application and could have their agency terminated by SF. The carriers take mis-reps by an agent as one of the biggest sins only topped by stealing premium.
The cheap premium you found for 1/4 the price of everyone else is great as long as you don't have a claim.
But... If you have a claim - when the claims adjuster finds out the property is vacant your claim will be denied. When you say the agent said it was ok my bet is the agent becomes stupid very fast and the claims reps will pull up the policy application you signed and ask if that is your signature on it. You obviously say yes. The claim stays denied even though your agent was shady because on that app (aka contract) it will have verbiage asking if the property is occupied.
Signing the mis-represented application keeps you at fault beyond what the agent did wrong and you'll be forced to sue the agent under an E&O claim and if you don't have any proof in writing from the agent saying it's ok to insure the vacant property then you are SOL.
So what now - don't blow up your agent just ask them direct questions by email and get it in writing back that your vacant/rehab property will be covered on the existing policy as written. Then if you have a claim you'll have documentation for the E&O claim.
If the agent won't put it in writing... you have your answer and need to move your coverage to a propert vacant/rehab policy.