All Forum Posts by: Michael K.
Michael K. has started 9 posts and replied 89 times.
Post: WTK: Costar pricing?

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Hello!
I'm going nuts trying to get pricing from Costar. They don't post it on their website and the people answering the phones can't give pricing without putting me through some sort of online tour beforehand (which I don't have time to take right now).
Is anybody familiar with Costar's pricing?
Thanks,
Mike
Post: Phoenix thieves

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
I've already encountered homes where the foreclosed soon-to-be-former owner plugs the pipes with cement and lets the water run as they leave.
The damage is horrendous to repair, and we're not even beginning to talk about mold remediation...
Mike
Post: Can't make tenant happy.

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Originally posted by Ralph Scott:
A valid fear! Why not modify that to state that the tenant is responsible for the first $50.00 of each repair? In other words, set it up like an insurance deductible.
While the tenant could still cause more damage "to stick it to the man," they're still on the hook for their $50.00. While it wouldn't end maintenance calls, it'd definitely cut down on them.
You're going to personally "insure" your tenant damages, limiting their liability to $50, and put that in your lease?
Please say I'm not reading that right.
I tell tenants they cannot make repairs without my approval, and anything other than normal wear and tear is on their dime, regardless of the cost or who makes the repair. There are occasions where the owner is responsible (roof leak, furnace failure, etc), but tenant caused damage is tenant paid damage.
You're not reading that right. :wink:
I'm advocating that the tenant be responsible for the first $50.00 worth of repairs.
Mike
Post: Quick fix for natural woodwork - Old English Scratch Remover rocks!

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
I just had a move-out where the tenant scratched and dinged the hell out of the natural woodwork. The trim was beat, the cabinets were scratched and dinged, the doors (closet and regular) were beat and tired... The woodwork was a MESS and I saw a good 20-30 hours of sanding and staining in my future.
A family member recommended Old English Scratch Cover. It's carried at Ace Hardware in this area. A small bottle was six bucks. Well, what did I have to lose?
My God, it's nothing short of amazing! The scratches all but vanished, dents blended in and looked natural (these are older properties, so the "aged" look is very acceptable), and everything was renewed.
It was simple to use; wet down a rag THAT YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ANY MORE, rub the scratch cover in the direction of the grain over/into the blemish, let it sit for 5-10 min, and wipe off the excess with a clean rag THAT YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ANY MORE.
Did I mention that you shouldn't use a good rag?
Any how, I can easily say that this was the best six bucks I ever spent for a cleaning product. My experience is that one bottle will handle two 3BR apartments.
Mike
Post: A Land Lords Master Tool Box

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Big yard-size garbage bags and smaller supermarket bags. It seems like I'm constantly picking up trash around the properties!
Mike
Post: automatic door locks

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
I'm in the process of replacing all of the main door locks and the basement locks in a four-building apartment complex. Install one of those piston-type automatic door closers and get the self-locking locks as described above. DON'T do deadbolts; the tenants will just throw the bolt while the door is open so the door won't close properly. Deadbolts like this are nothing but automatic door props.
As for the coin laundry issue, be sure to check your state laws about card vs coin laundries. Believe it or not, some states (Wisconsin is one) have an additional tax on non-coin operated laundries!
Mike
Post: Are Home Warranty plans worth it?

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
I had one on my home in Arizona; it was built in 1999 and I bought it in 2004. The original builder got sued out of existence due to shoddy workmanship. For $450.00 plus a $100.00 deductible per item, I got a new water heater, a new central a/c unit, a new heat pump, some roof work, and one other item that I forget right now.
The $950.00 I spent between the plan and the deductibles MORE than covered the price of the replacement central air unit alone, not counting the other three items.
That said, I'd say that the warranty depends upon your situation. How old are the items that you're worried about? How likely is it that they'll need replacing during the terms of the warranty?
Mike
Post: Mike from Milwaukee, WI checking in!

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Originally posted by Jeffrey Koenig:
Thank you! Still returning to getting used to the market up here. It's definitely different than Arizona!
Mike
Post: Eviction stats ??

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Originally posted by MikeOH:
I do keep statistics on evictions. When I was building my portfolio, I had an eviction rate of 1% per month. Now that my properties are stabilized (meaning almost all of the tenants have been screened by me), my eviction rate varies between .25% and .5% per month (3% and 6% per year).
My primary screening criteria is that I don't take anyone that has an eviction on their record in the past 5 years or anyone that has a felony or more than 2 misdemeanors or any illegal drugs on their record in the past 3 years. I check EVERYONE that will be living in the house. I also don't care whether the tenant was actually evicted - the only thing that matters to me is that there was an eviction case filed against the tenant. If another landlord needed to file an eviction case to get the scumbag to leave - that's good enough for me!!! In the case of a felon, they must have been out of prison for 3 years.
Of course, you still need to contact previous landlords; their employer (if any), etc.
Finally, never 'work with' someone on a deposit. They either have the first month's rent and security deposit IN FULL AND IN CASH, or they don't move in.
Good Luck,
Mike
You're stricter than we are, but we've also got WAY more problems than you do! I guess it all comes down to how much BS you're willing to handle. In my cousins' case, they're willing to handle a LOT of BS.
Felons: No violent felonies within the last three years. Non-violent offenders can come right in, although we will check with their parole officer.
Sex offenders: No non-consentual sex offenders allowed.
Drugs: No manufacturing or distribution within the last three years unless on active parole with the recommendation of their parole officer.
Check forgers / bad check offenses: If less than 3 years old, ALL payments must be in cash or in the form of a POSTAL money order.
Evictions: Nothing current. (We get LOTS of applicants who are in the middle of getting evicted.) No more than one in the past two years.
Security deposits: 100% must be paid up-front unless they are actively working with a community organization that guarantees their deposit.
First month's rent: Due at move-in unless through rent assistance or through a community agency that covers the rent.
That's about all.
Mike
Post: Your thoughts on what makes a property “in a war zoneâ€.

- Investor
- Milwaukee, WI
- Posts 89
- Votes 44
Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
While we certainly have more equity and have more cash flow than a deadbeat (most of the time anyway) we're certainly going to be an enraging target if one of said deadbeats thinks you're a good score only to be disappointed.
Someone mentioned snakes. At least carry some pepper spray Rich. I carry my gun for varmints of the 2 legged and 4 legged variety. Going into a vacant REO, you never know which will be hanging out in there. A rabid dog can be just as dangerous as a deadbeat.
A friend of mine in Tennessee had some problem tenants. These tenants left four puit bulls in the basement without ANY food. Imagine returning to clean out your property a few days after and facing FOUR purposefully starved PIT BULLS.
While an extreme example, it is still an example.
Mike