Originally posted by Bryan A.:
the question was investments that are passive and have minimal risk...answering that questino with rental property is a surefire way to not be taken seriously....sorry to be harsh, but rentals are very hands on....even if they're 'turnkey' and you have a PM and you live 500 miles away, who pays when there's an eviction and the tenant tears the place up...so now you're out a few months of rent, costs for eviction, costs to fix the place up, and vacancy time while looking for a new tenant...not to mention, as a landlord, you will get sued at some point..we had a thread about a week or 2 ago..i've also seen it first hand..the owner gets sued first, even if the property manager was the one who mishandled something and the owner had no idea--how is that minimal risk?
I somewhat agree, there IS risk. Can you tell me where in R.E.I. there is not risk?
Flips: the market can turn, you have lots of money tied into the property, after sale you can get sued and forced to put more work into it
Buying REO, you can get sued by the previous owner that they were victum of predatory lending, and they are fighting to retain the property post foreclosure. OR it looks good, and once into it, surprise surprise, there is massive mold inside some walls that inspection didn't show and banks sell "as-is" with no way to go back.
All aspects hold risk, it is a question of how much risk and what type. I respect that your personal feelings are rentals are high risk. I could fill a Raddison with investors who will argue to the ends of the earth that rentals are the safest and they would never touch anything else.
I am indifferent. I evaluate each situation on it's individual merits. I will say, generally speaking, rentals are the strongest right now.
1) lending for home purchase has tightened greatly, greater difficulty qualifying to purchase a home = more renters.
2) market average pricing is at a near dead = price with rental rates. meaning far easier to cash flow WITH financing
3) many markets are seeing the smallest vacency rate in decades. In my market, vacency rate is <3%, market average has been 10%. That means huge demand, and I can be ultra selective.
4) A rental is viewed and taxed as a business, ie. a person can deduct all those managment costs, depritiation, and so on, creating non-taxed profits, as well as mortgage interest being tax deductable, so numerious tax advantages, where flips have capital gains
5) With a full managment company, you do NOTHING, they do 100%, from showings, lease's, too evictions, cleanups, and so on. My m,anagment co. gives eviction insurance, tennant warrenty. You are incorrect, a investor does NOT need to be involved a drop more then desired.
6) Rents can be raised, especially in a high demand market
7) Local, State and Fed agencies have programs to provide funds FOR rental investors, I have never found 1 cent for any other R.E>I. system.
I just want to point out, rentals do have many up sides. To root out rentals a generically being bad, is like saying the stock market is great because Microsoft stock went up.
Some markets and areas are NOT good rental areas, as with all R.E.I. one must KNOW the market area.
For my money, I am pressing my holding booking bigger and bigger. And I personally never deal with prop. managment issues, EVER. It is not effective use of my time. And myself, I have only profited. We had an add to rent a 2bd 1bth unit recently, we recieved 100 e-mails in 24 hrs, it was insane. I could require blood testing and physicals in my rental ap's and I think i would still be flooded, lol.
I am able to cherry pick who i want to rent to.
I respect your opinion that you don't like rentals. My numbers, and many many other investors, aside from emotion state holding is a home run right now.