After months ... well, maybe a year, of lurking, I've submitted my "introduction" post and made a few other small contributions to some of the fora.
Now I've sat down to raise the questions responsible for my being here in the first place and I'm not exactly certain how to start ... so, rather than try to write eloquently, like any engineer, I'll resort to a bullet list of the facts ;-)
1) As alluded in my introductory post (http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/55/topics/88317-new-sort-of-in-canada ) I realise we have arrived at the point where, if we are to grow our real estate business to meet our objectives in a reasonable time period we need to start using other peoples money (OPM) to purchase properties.
2) I've helped raise both private and public funds for startups in my past, so the principal and general process is not foreign to me.
3) Despite the above two facts, I am presently seeing the task of approaching people for private financing as a "necessary evil" and am loath to do it. I also know, I need to straighten this out in my head before I begin looking for financiers or I'll be unsuccessful at convincing anyone.
4) I've been {over}analyising this trepidation and I know it is due in-part to the fact I am uncomfortable "selling" - but this is not new and I have always been able to overcome it in the past and was actually very good at pitching.
5) In the past I was operating in my engineering domain (specialized area) and I was extremely confident my depth of knowledge exceeded that of the investors and fund managers to whom I was presenting.
6) The difference this time around is I'll be pitching/selling a far more general idea (a rental property) to an audience whose experience in the domain may likely exceed my own. So it boils down to confidence in my analysis and domain knowledge.
7) Rationally, math is math and unless I made a horrible mistake in one or more assumptions, the numbers do not lie.
8) In my current analysis/screening of properties/deals I am looking for
a) positive cashflow;
b) operating expense ratio <50%;
c) debt coverage >=1.5;
d) PE <3;
e) Cash-on-Cash of 10-12+;
f) BER <=75 (80 at the max)
g) I tend not to be driven terribly by the CAP rate if the cash-on-cash is good - in the local market it is extremely rare to find a multi-unit with a CAP >7.5 to 9
In our analysis we use an opportunity cost of 8%; a maintenance & CAPX set aside of 10%; and assume a vacancy rate of 8.33% (1 month in 12) ... we try to be conservative
9) I do realise that while the above ratios have been fine for us, they may not be sufficient for a potential private money financier. However, I would think so long as we can demonstrate the cash-flow can service their note and provide sufficient reserve, as a debt financier they woud be satisfied.
What I am looking for at this point is
a) a general indication of whether we are rowing in the right direction;
b) tips on how to package/present an offer to a financier ... in engineering it is analytical and easy, my experience thus far in real-estate (with Sellers and conventional mortgagees) is there is a far higher degree of subjectivity in decision making.
c) Any indication on what we may need to change in qualifying our properties prior to striking a deal ... i.e. do any of our conditions need to be tightened?
Any and all feedback is welcomed ... after digesting it, I should be able to focus future questions a little better.