All Forum Posts by: Nikhil Paul
Nikhil Paul has started 2 posts and replied 4 times.
Post: Oshawa Duplex Timeline

- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts 5
- Votes 0
Thanks @David Steinbok!!
That's exactly the information I was looking for. Might reach out to you for more questions if that's ok? Myself and a partner are looking to start actively pursuing a duplex conversion in Oshawa.
Post: Oshawa Duplex Timeline

- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts 5
- Votes 0
Hi,
Anyone on here who completed a duplex conversion Oshawa. I'm wondering what the timeline is for receiving city approval for an Oshawa duplex?
Post: Question about Promote/Carried Interest

- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts 5
- Votes 0
@Ronald Rohde
Hmm. But in that example, if the raise was $300k for the project where would the additional $60 come from if the GPs don’t put anything down?
Thanks for the reply, first major capital raise so trying to make sure I get a few things clears up.
Post: Question about Promote/Carried Interest

- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts 5
- Votes 0
Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I didn't see an "Equity" section in the forms.
First a few example numbers: Say the property is $1,000,000 with 30% down, so $300,000 equity required @ 8% hurdle.
So this question is in relation to promote/carried interest. I know of the typical promote/carried interest used in RE/PE where say an 80/20 split is on the profits above the hurdle rate. But in the BP podcast 324, the guest spoke about taking the carried interest at the start. I.e, If he raised $300,000 for the downpayment, he took 20% off the start for "sweat equity", search costs, etc. (so he gets $60,000 right off the bat and LPs are left with $240,000 of what they invested) and the cash flows get distributed at the 20/80 split.
Is this common? Why would anyone do this? Seems like the LPs are giving up a tremendous amount if the give up equity at the get-go.