Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Peter Sinclair

Peter Sinclair has started 2 posts and replied 65 times.

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Derrick E.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Derrick E.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Irina Belkofer:

interesting how people see the situation so differently 

When I've read the OP, my first reaction was - of course, rent! It's a no brainer ;)

When reading comments, I'm realizing that it's not so obvious for everybody.

Any income can disappear - my tenant once lost a job he was at for 23 year.....next - eviction.

10 month worth rent - I'd put in my trust account, not as security deposit but rent in advance. Yes, there is tax implications, so what? We still pay taxes and if she does it on January 1st - it's still the same as she would pay monthly. However, it secured the lease for these 10 months.

As someone said, IF she requested her money back?!? No, she should move out first, sign the lease dissolution and pay all the damages ......my contract includes quite few fees for early termination if the lease.

Next, her credit. I assume, nobody ever get divorced here.....good for you! But when people divorce, banckruptcy, foreclosure, default on their credit cards do happen. More of that, it's good for the landlord! Why? Because she won't be able to buy her next house any soon. She will rent,....and if you're lucky - from you!

I'd take such a tenant without thinking twice - in 3-4 years she'd pay off my condo ;) 

It's amazing how people discuss stupid difference between 650 and 635 FICO but won't see the whole picture.

Who cares about credit in these situations? People's life is going down totally, divorce and banckruptcy wipe off whole previous good things. If you're not helping people, be smart at least to help yourself. Such tenants are priceless!

What makes you think I didn’t consider the whole picture? 

I see a bankrupt applicant with maxed out credit cards, but supposedly has $60k in the bank (not yet proven). She makes $1700 a month, but how much of this is is actually leftover, and is enough leftover to pay for rent? Its not stated. She may get awarded alimony but until then cant be proven. 

What did I miss? 

You keep saying this. Who cares about her part time job if she is willing to pre-pay for a whole years worth of rent up front?

Also, from the way I understood the response from the OP it's not credit card debt. That's the note on the truck/vehicle that her ex-husband is in charge of taking care of. It's not $13k in credit cards, its $13k they still owe on the truck.....that's how I took it at least. 

 “Has a joint credit card with a $13,000 limit that has $13,600 on it currently and is 30 days past due.” - OP

I took it literally.. I don’t know how you confused it for a truck payment.. 

Her job is important... the OP stated that she didn’t provide proof yet.. so going off someone’s word is ill advised.. Also, what happens at the end of the lease; When she needs to make monthly payments? Wouldn’t the job be important then? When screening a tenant you have to look beyond the now and assess for the future! 

The end of the lease is the end of the lease. So what? If she doesn't have her stuff together then she moves out unless she can pay another years worth of rent up front.

Do you expect your tenants to stay for forever?

Also, I got it confused because later down the OP said the LOC from Chase was for a truck the husband was supposed to be paying. Guess I somehow got the two confused.

 “So what?” Lol You make it seem as if the eviction process is simple, free, and not time consuming! 

While I don’t expect my tenants to stay forever,  I do expect them to make their rent payment on time and in full. Job history is an important peice of evidence in assessing such risk. Yes, a person working 30 years can be fired or layed off just as easily as someone working for 3 months... however, their history proves that this is unlikely.. meaning less risk. 

So, while taking a big sum partially mitigates the current years risk, it doesn’t tell me she’ll make a good tenant later. But a long working history does tell me she was respondsible enough to keep her job for said such amount of time. 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Derrick E.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Irina Belkofer:

interesting how people see the situation so differently 

When I've read the OP, my first reaction was - of course, rent! It's a no brainer ;)

When reading comments, I'm realizing that it's not so obvious for everybody.

Any income can disappear - my tenant once lost a job he was at for 23 year.....next - eviction.

10 month worth rent - I'd put in my trust account, not as security deposit but rent in advance. Yes, there is tax implications, so what? We still pay taxes and if she does it on January 1st - it's still the same as she would pay monthly. However, it secured the lease for these 10 months.

As someone said, IF she requested her money back?!? No, she should move out first, sign the lease dissolution and pay all the damages ......my contract includes quite few fees for early termination if the lease.

Next, her credit. I assume, nobody ever get divorced here.....good for you! But when people divorce, banckruptcy, foreclosure, default on their credit cards do happen. More of that, it's good for the landlord! Why? Because she won't be able to buy her next house any soon. She will rent,....and if you're lucky - from you!

I'd take such a tenant without thinking twice - in 3-4 years she'd pay off my condo ;) 

It's amazing how people discuss stupid difference between 650 and 635 FICO but won't see the whole picture.

Who cares about credit in these situations? People's life is going down totally, divorce and banckruptcy wipe off whole previous good things. If you're not helping people, be smart at least to help yourself. Such tenants are priceless!

What makes you think I didn’t consider the whole picture? 

I see a bankrupt applicant with maxed out credit cards, but supposedly has $60k in the bank (not yet proven). She makes $1700 a month, but how much of this is is actually leftover, and is enough leftover to pay for rent? Its not stated. She may get awarded alimony but until then cant be proven. 

What did I miss? 

You keep saying this. Who cares about her part time job if she is willing to pre-pay for a whole years worth of rent up front?

Also, from the way I understood the response from the OP it's not credit card debt. That's the note on the truck/vehicle that her ex-husband is in charge of taking care of. It's not $13k in credit cards, its $13k they still owe on the truck.....that's how I took it at least. 

 “Has a joint credit card with a $13,000 limit that has $13,600 on it currently and is 30 days past due.” - OP

I took it literally.. I don’t know how you confused it for a truck payment.. 

Her job is important... the OP stated that she didn’t provide proof yet.. so going off someone’s word is ill advised.. Also, what happens at the end of the lease; When she needs to make monthly payments? Wouldn’t the job be important then? When screening a tenant you have to look beyond the now and assess for the future! 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:

Stick with the minimum requirements you set when screening tenants. Its good to be empathetic but don’t get caught up in their situations. 

If you require a minimum credit score of 650 and the tenant has a 635.. stick to your minimum. If you have minimum household income requirements such as double or triple the rent.. stick with it! Her alimony isn’t set in stone... what if the husband doesn’t pay?

There were times I felt bad turning down a renter, especially after they’ve paid a $40 application fee but I have to remind myself these are the rules of the game.

If you decide to turn her down, you can always pass the buck of blame to someone else. For example, I tell my renters that I just manage the place and the “owner” makes the ultimate decision.  In your situation I would say “ I pleaded on your behalf and explained everything to the owner but they decided not to waive the minimum requirements, If I could rent it to yah.. I definitely would.. I’m sure you’ll find a place better than this one anyhow.” 

Since you are giving that advice what is the difference between a 650 and a 635 credit score.

 The difference could be attributed to many factors, such as maxing out a credit card, being late on a payment, having your credit run multiple times. A 650 credit score ranks higher than 40% of US consumers, whereas a 635 credit score ranks higher than 36% of US consumers. 

Not that I consider it relevant for a rental applicant  - I don't -  but the difference could simply be down to putting a large item that you can perfectly afford on  interest free credit at Loews.

Even with your example, I can argue that if you can perfectly afford something, why not just pay it off? What if after this large purchase you get laid off from work and you cant afford these interests free payments anymore.

Since differing credit scores have a myriad of affecting factors, i chose to screen my tenants against minimum credit score as it provides an objective reference point for me to make decisions rather than leave them up to questionable, subjective interpretations of ones credit score.

Why not pay it off. Because I understand what net present value is and If interest free credit had no value it wouldn't be there as an incentive.  

As you say credit scores have a myriad of affecting factors. Well most of which have nothing to do with the likelihood of the tenant continuing to pay rent for the very simple reason that that's not what a credit score measures. That's why I ignore them but even if I didn't it would be why I wouldn't be dogmatic about them

Credit scores are a tool used to determine how likely someone is to default on a debt. So when we see someone with a credit score of 800, we can assume that this person is not as likely to default on their debt compared to someone with a credit score of 650. Its a tool used to quantify risk.

It can be said that rent can be comparable to one’s debt payment, ie: mortgage payment vs rental payment, both need to be paid if you want a place to live. So, your statement that credit score has nothing to do with the likelihood of the tenant continuing to pay rent isn’t entirely true. Credit score is one many factors to consider when renting to a tenant, but not an the only thing to consider. It must be taken in consideration with ones job history, income, and other influencing, financial attributions. 

Wrong. Wrong and Wrong.

Credit scores measure how profitable a prospect is or will be to the credit lending industry. 

That's why lenders are willing to pay credit scoring companies for them.

That's why people who pay lots of credit card interest can get high credit scores even though it's an irresponsible way to borrow and they are only a paycheck away from being unable to meet their obligations (which is often why they have credit card borrowing).

That's also why credit scores  don't factor in things that  have a huge bearing on your ability to repay debt like your net worth.

 Well... DUH! A person who doesn’t pay their debts isn’t profitable! 

“That’s why people who pay lots of credit card interest can get high credit score...” - Ihe O 

If this were true, why do people with bad credit have higher interests rates? From your logic, people with higher scores would have higher interests rates.... Dont believe me? Here’s a simple infographic that was formed using just such data. 

Net worth doesn’t have a direct correlation to the ability for one to repay a debt. For example, I can own 100 acres of undeveloped land deemed to be worth 7 million dollars. But I’m 18 year old high-school dropout with no job and a maxed out credit card that I used to go visit my future wife that is locked up in Puerto Rico for drug smuggling. In this scenario, my net worth has nothing to do with my ability to repay. 

So, net worth doesn’t have as huge a bearing as you want to believe! 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54

While I don’t recommend making decisions based on anecdotal information, sometimes it helps to know what’s happened with others in the same situation.

My first duplex I rented to a family that offered to pay a full years worth of rent. The place was a 2bd/1.5 bathroom for $2100 a month. My minimum requirements are a 650 credit score, minimum $4200 household income, and clean background check. Their reason for paying in full was they saved up while living with family, and did not have any rental history or and the husband was not a US citizen. Credit report for the wife was clean (score of 700ish) and had a history of paying their car payment regularly for past 2 years. The husband and wife background came back clean. The husband could not provide income proof, as he was often paid in cash, but the wife showed a stable job history with decent pay.

After weighing this information, I accepted their application and we signed a year lease. Their lease would also become month to month when it expired. I used the years worth of rent and applied it to the principle only on the mortgage. After their lease ended I also marked up the rent by 5% to stay close to the current market prices. 

They were basic tenants that never complained about anything, except that the hot water temp was too high.   They also moved in extra family members and a pet (which was against their lease). I didn’t make a fuss of things because 1) the utilities that I covered remained consistent and didn’t cost me more, and 2) neighbors didn’t complain about the dog. After 14 months of renting they moved out due to an expanding family. I ended up deducting $781 from their security to deposit to make certain repairs, having the unit cleaned, and to have the place fumigated as they infested the unit with roaches. 

Pretty boring story huh? Lol 

Ultimately, its your decision and investment. With every renter comes a gamble, its your job to mitigate the risks as much as possible. My suggestion is to look beyond the tenants situation and just focus on the facts at hand. If her work history is pretty stable, she actually can pay the rent in advance, and her story checks out.. move ahead and just get things taken care of. 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Irina Belkofer:

interesting how people see the situation so differently 

When I've read the OP, my first reaction was - of course, rent! It's a no brainer ;)

When reading comments, I'm realizing that it's not so obvious for everybody.

Any income can disappear - my tenant once lost a job he was at for 23 year.....next - eviction.

10 month worth rent - I'd put in my trust account, not as security deposit but rent in advance. Yes, there is tax implications, so what? We still pay taxes and if she does it on January 1st - it's still the same as she would pay monthly. However, it secured the lease for these 10 months.

As someone said, IF she requested her money back?!? No, she should move out first, sign the lease dissolution and pay all the damages ......my contract includes quite few fees for early termination if the lease.

Next, her credit. I assume, nobody ever get divorced here.....good for you! But when people divorce, banckruptcy, foreclosure, default on their credit cards do happen. More of that, it's good for the landlord! Why? Because she won't be able to buy her next house any soon. She will rent,....and if you're lucky - from you!

I'd take such a tenant without thinking twice - in 3-4 years she'd pay off my condo ;) 

It's amazing how people discuss stupid difference between 650 and 635 FICO but won't see the whole picture.

Who cares about credit in these situations? People's life is going down totally, divorce and banckruptcy wipe off whole previous good things. If you're not helping people, be smart at least to help yourself. Such tenants are priceless!

What makes you think I didn’t consider the whole picture? 

I see a bankrupt applicant with maxed out credit cards, but supposedly has $60k in the bank (not yet proven). She makes $1700 a month, but how much of this is is actually leftover, and is enough leftover to pay for rent? Its not stated. She may get awarded alimony but until then cant be proven. 

What did I miss? 

Post: First multi-family and rental

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54

Here is some info I found on your place that may help you with your decision

Post: First multi-family and rental

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54

Hit up your RE agent and ask her/him to get you the info you need such as current rents, operating costs and expenditures, and lease information (month to month, year long, etc). 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Josh Green:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:

Stick with the minimum requirements you set when screening tenants. Its good to be empathetic but don’t get caught up in their situations. 

If you require a minimum credit score of 650 and the tenant has a 635.. stick to your minimum. If you have minimum household income requirements such as double or triple the rent.. stick with it! Her alimony isn’t set in stone... what if the husband doesn’t pay?

There were times I felt bad turning down a renter, especially after they’ve paid a $40 application fee but I have to remind myself these are the rules of the game.

If you decide to turn her down, you can always pass the buck of blame to someone else. For example, I tell my renters that I just manage the place and the “owner” makes the ultimate decision.  In your situation I would say “ I pleaded on your behalf and explained everything to the owner but they decided not to waive the minimum requirements, If I could rent it to yah.. I definitely would.. I’m sure you’ll find a place better than this one anyhow.” 

Since you are giving that advice what is the difference between a 650 and a 635 credit score.

 The difference could be attributed to many factors, such as maxing out a credit card, being late on a payment, having your credit run multiple times. A 650 credit score ranks higher than 40% of US consumers, whereas a 635 credit score ranks higher than 36% of US consumers. 

Not that I consider it relevant for a rental applicant  - I don't -  but the difference could simply be down to putting a large item that you can perfectly afford on  interest free credit at Loews.

Even with your example, I can argue that if you can perfectly afford something, why not just pay it off? What if after this large purchase you get laid off from work and you cant afford these interests free payments anymore.

Since differing credit scores have a myriad of affecting factors, i chose to screen my tenants against minimum credit score as it provides an objective reference point for me to make decisions rather than leave them up to questionable, subjective interpretations of ones credit score.

It’s called strategic debt. I can pay off my car but the loan is 1.9% and my portfolio is up 22.90% ytd. 

I’ll play the devil’s advocate :) 

What happens to your stragtegic debt if the economy crashes again and the renters you relied on loses their jobs. Whose gonna pay for that mortgage then? 

My argument isn’t about taking on debt.. it’s analysizing ones ability to make their debt payments. 

Post: Would You Rent To This Applicant?

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:
Originally posted by @Ihe O.:
Originally posted by @Peter Sinclair:

Stick with the minimum requirements you set when screening tenants. Its good to be empathetic but don’t get caught up in their situations. 

If you require a minimum credit score of 650 and the tenant has a 635.. stick to your minimum. If you have minimum household income requirements such as double or triple the rent.. stick with it! Her alimony isn’t set in stone... what if the husband doesn’t pay?

There were times I felt bad turning down a renter, especially after they’ve paid a $40 application fee but I have to remind myself these are the rules of the game.

If you decide to turn her down, you can always pass the buck of blame to someone else. For example, I tell my renters that I just manage the place and the “owner” makes the ultimate decision.  In your situation I would say “ I pleaded on your behalf and explained everything to the owner but they decided not to waive the minimum requirements, If I could rent it to yah.. I definitely would.. I’m sure you’ll find a place better than this one anyhow.” 

Since you are giving that advice what is the difference between a 650 and a 635 credit score.

 The difference could be attributed to many factors, such as maxing out a credit card, being late on a payment, having your credit run multiple times. A 650 credit score ranks higher than 40% of US consumers, whereas a 635 credit score ranks higher than 36% of US consumers. 

Not that I consider it relevant for a rental applicant  - I don't -  but the difference could simply be down to putting a large item that you can perfectly afford on  interest free credit at Loews.

Even with your example, I can argue that if you can perfectly afford something, why not just pay it off? What if after this large purchase you get laid off from work and you cant afford these interests free payments anymore.

Since differing credit scores have a myriad of affecting factors, i chose to screen my tenants against minimum credit score as it provides an objective reference point for me to make decisions rather than leave them up to questionable, subjective interpretations of ones credit score.

Why not pay it off. Because I understand what net present value is and If interest free credit had no value it wouldn't be there as an incentive.  

As you say credit scores have a myriad of affecting factors. Well most of which have nothing to do with the likelihood of the tenant continuing to pay rent for the very simple reason that that's not what a credit score measures. That's why I ignore them but even if I didn't it would be why I wouldn't be dogmatic about them

Credit scores are a tool used to determine how likely someone is to default on a debt. So when we see someone with a credit score of 800, we can assume that this person is not as likely to default on their debt compared to someone with a credit score of 650. Its a tool used to quantify risk.

It can be said that rent can be comparable to one’s debt payment, ie: mortgage payment vs rental payment, both need to be paid if you want a place to live. So, your statement that credit score has nothing to do with the likelihood of the tenant continuing to pay rent isn’t entirely true. Credit score is one many factors to consider when renting to a tenant, but not an the only thing to consider. It must be taken in consideration with ones job history, income, and other influencing, financial attributions. 

Post: Quartz Countertop Issue

Peter SinclairPosted
  • Duarte, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 54

https://www.angieslist.com/articles/dont-get-ripped-how-fight-bad-contractor.htm

I found this... there’s some good advice in the article.