Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ryan Logsdon

Ryan Logsdon has started 0 posts and replied 117 times.

Of my friends who have used B of A loans, not one has said a bad word. On the contrary, I've only heard great things.

Post: Dale Carnegie Course

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

I haven't taken the course, but How to Win Friends and Influence People is one of top three best books I've ever read. Also on that list is Winning the Loser's Game, Ellis (investment).

Post: What Is Your Best Landlording Tip?

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Forget screening tenants. Screen PMs and hire good one.

Post: Knowing when to cut your losses?

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Bill Gulley is correct, you can't transfer all maintenance to the tenant. However, you can certainly transfer the day-to-day duties that your PM performs back to the tenant.

Post: Knowing when to cut your losses?

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Don't worry, this is impossible. Entering an option contract is a private event. Plus, an option plainly isn't ownership.

Post: Can I set a max # of adults living in house

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Matt Devincenzo's correct, this is protected. However, you're not out should more people move in after your tenants are placed. So long as your contract contains a provision for it, you're allowed to increase the rent by a set amount if additional people stay longer than (usually) 30 days. This is to offset your increased utility costs.

Post: Knowing when to cut your losses?

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Greg Fend, the lease approach mentioned by Wendell De Guzman sounds similar to my dad's approach.

In lieu of locking in a nominal % upfront (usually 2-5%) for the option, you increase the rent. So you'd go from your current $1400 to say $1600. The extra $200 is set aside in a trust that you create on the behalf of the tenant. This trust sits and grows for 3 years or however long your option date is in the future. Should the tenant wish to exercise the option to buy, this fund is theirs and can be counted towards their down payment. Should the option expire, the funds are yours.

The beauty is:

1. the funds are often massively larger than anyone would pay with an upfront fee,

2. the funds are always yours; if the option is exercised, it's paid to you; if the option isn't exercised, it's defaulted to you, and your contract must reflect this clearly and upfront (straight and narrow!),

3. you're creating a huge catalyst for the tenant to want to follow through with the agreement.

And as Tom mentioned, you'll save even more when you find a tenant who wants the buy-option because you transfer all maintenance costs to the tenant.

Post: New Logo - Thoughts?

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

1st is good, simple. 2nd's too distracting to see it spells out a word at 1st glance.

Post: The numbers may look good, but it is a terrible investment.

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Tom Goans

I couldn't agree more, my friend.

Post: The numbers may look good, but it is a terrible investment.

Ryan LogsdonPosted
  • SFR Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 134
  • Votes 16

Some people don't even proof the numbers they send. Last week, an agent faked his numbers. Using his numbers, the properties were cash flowing 28%. Heck! Sign me up! ...Oh wait, fake numbers.