Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kyle J.

Kyle J. has started 61 posts and replied 5023 times.

Post: cash out refinance investment metrics

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

I had a little bit of a hard time understanding your question, but if I understood it correctly then my opinion is that the new property would be essentially 100% financed. Here's my understanding of your question and my reasoning (using made up rounded-off numbers/percentages):

You already own rental property #1 (RP #1).

You want to buy rental property #2 (RP #2) for $100,000.

You take out a new mortgage for 80% ($80,000) of the cost to buy RP #2.

You do a cash out refi on RP #1 for the other 20% ($20,000) needed to buy RP #2.

You now have $100,000 to buy RP #2. However, all of this money is financed. Additionally, all of this money would be considered debt service (and deductible against) RP #2 (including the $20k you pulled out of RP #1).

Consequently, I would consider RP #2 to be 100% financed.

Post: Need Expert Opinions For Rental Positive Cash Flow

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174
Originally posted by Amir Saeed:
Thanks Kyle.. I was just thinking maybe I can buy the property on my Wife's name, meaning that she can say that she wants to buy the property. Basically the property would be her first house. The only issue is that she is a stay home mom but she does have good credit. I can be the co-signer, and then we can go with the 5% or little +-. If this works would the bank still look at me (the co-signer) as someone who owns a house and is co-signing. Do you think this can work. Please share your thoughts...Thanks.

It's creative, but it won't work. Even with good credit, there's no way your wife will qualify on her own with no income. So you'll have to apply jointly with her. Plus, even if she did have an income and could qualify on her own, she'd have to falsify the part where she states that she intends to occupy the home as her primary residence. Not a good idea to lie.

You can still get really good interest rates right now even on investment properties. Granted, you'll have to save up for a bigger down payment, but aside from that you can get rates in the low 4%'s. Maybe just try to save up some more so you can take advantage of these killer rates. Or do like some people and wholesale a few deals until you get the cash built up.

Post: Need Expert Opinions For Rental Positive Cash Flow

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

You're going to have a hard time getting a conventional loan for an investment property with only 5% down. You can try to "make" it whatever you want, but in the end it is what it is.

Two questions for you: 1) Do you intend to personally use (stay in) this property at all? And 2) How far away (in miles) will it be from your primary residence?

If you intend to personally stay in it, then MAYBE it could be a vacation home. If you intend to stay in it some times and rent it out other times, then it's going to be considered "mixed use" and you'll have to pro-rate your deductions. If you don't intend to stay in it but say that you will, then that's considered lying.

In regards to how far away it is from your primary residence, if it's in the same city (or very close to it), then it's not going to be considered a vacation home.

Post: Renting to Megan's Law offender?

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

I've chosen not to rent to criminals in general, especially serious offenders.

That being said, Rob K brings up a very good point. If you rent to one in a multi-family property, you risk losing all of your other tenants and/or making it harder to attract new tenants in the future. Hardly seems worth the risk.

Post: Tenant was stealing utilities. Now in jail.

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

Great outcome to your story. :) I hate thieves.

Post: classified sites in US

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

Probably one of the more popular ones is Craigslist.

Post: Daycare in Rental homes

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

Here's another online source for info on the subject (again, for California landlords). This one is written by a landlord-tenant attorney.

http://www.yourlegalcorner.com/articles.asp?cat=land&id=115

Post: Daycare in Rental homes

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

Not so fast. Check your state laws before you decide whether or not to allow a daycare. Most people don't know this, but in some states (like mine - California) the tenant does NOT need the landlord's persmission to run a home daycare. They only have to advise you that they are operating one.

Here's some info on the subject (for California landlords):

http://www.childcarelaw.org/docs/qanda-landlords.pdf

Post: Garage door opener

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

She can have a remote, just like she can have a key to your house. Whether or not she can go in without your knowledge is covered by local law and your lease. It's likely, that absent an emergency, that she cannot go in unannounced. Refer to your lease though to be sure.

On a side note, if I were you I would change the code to the garage opener. It's easy enough to do by holding down the button on the side and clicking the remote to reset the code. It may very well be that another device/opener is inadvertently opening your garage door, and/or it's a defective opener. Either way, if you change the code and you continue to find it open, you'll be able to narrow down the cause.

Post: Im so green... (Just a new member saying hello)

Kyle J.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
  • Posts 5,116
  • Votes 5,174

Welcome Derrick Brooks. I know what you mean...there's lots to read here. Lots of good info though.