First, just to set the record straight, you are all crazy. :D
I want to respond to just a bit of the silliness:
You're kidding, right? Yes, they do it. China censors about 85% of the Internet from its population so that it's not even accessible. Actually, many (perhaps most) of the other countries in the world censor the internet for their citizens. Sometiems just porn; sometimes also politics or other topics. Review the Harvard Berkman Institute's studies on Internet censorship for Iran and China and open your eyes. Though your point about it being bad government and an oppressive environment to have everything being watched is correct, your examples and citations are not.
As for the comment about a military person being in charge of the CIA being dangerous because you'd have "like minded people", that's just off base. I don't know too many people right now in the military that, just b/c they're in the military, love Rumsfeld or the war or what we're doing. That's like suggesting all the people who worked at Enron LOVED their CEO. Nor is there any basis for suggesting that the CIA has always been an honest broker, the beacon of reason, whereas the military has been cavalier. Vice versa, history suggests. Now, if the point is about putting a White House lackie in as Director, hey that's a real threat. Porter Goss was clearly not one. In my mind, Gen. Hayden is clearly better than Fran Townshend in any case. And now a word about intelligence analysis...
With the advent of computers, we can process tasks a lot faster than with good old shoe leather. That's why when someone gets their head chopped off and the cops take fingerprints, they don't just check them against a single person's for a match. They run them through the 25 million Americans and xxx million foreigners to see if there are matches. It isn't oppressive; it's efficient. Similar for signal intelligence, aka phone tapping. While ideally you would know every person involved in planning 9/11 and only tap their phones, in the real world of course you don't. So you cast the net wider and screen through those calls. So that's why they're doing it, not because they're trying to plant alien nanobots inside your ear drum. We have two congressional committees for oversight and a more or less free and open press to keep things on balance. Clearly, we have a free and open Internet too!
That said, we're very touchy about our civil liberties and even if ours are still LEAGUES better than China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and dozens of other countries, as Americans we want not just to be better, but to be the best. City on a Hill. That's a good thing. I'm certainly not defending Bush. I'm not saying there aren't dangers to what they're doing and I'm not saying there aren't violations, but at least do some due diligence before calling people liars, cheats, and bad naughty names. 8)