Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tim Swierczek

Tim Swierczek has started 13 posts and replied 1473 times.

Post: How can property taxes go up by 164%?

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Molly Jones:

Wow thanks for letting me know! As a first time investor I am quite wary of going out of state. Many of the connections I've made are here in Minnesota and I just feel a bit more comfortable starting here. 


 This particular property has special circumstances. The property is being charged $8,137.29 in special assessments. The charges are mainly due to it being a vacant building. That will drive up the taxes on any property.  The tax increase was 14.75%

The 2023 tax without the special assessment was $4,054.04

The 2024 tax without the special assessment was $4,274.83


Here's the breakdown from the County's website:

Values established by the assessor as of January 2, 2023

Estimated market value:$334,000Taxable market value:$326,820Total improvement amount: 

Total net tax:$4,274.83 Total special assessments:$8,137.29

Special assessment details:

010272316GST IMPRV RESURFACING$247.35
0109602023VACANT BUILDING REG$7,703.71
0125121T052021 TREE REMOVAL-5$186.23

Post: What Cash-on-Cash Return Should I Target in Multi-Family?

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Evan Polaski:

@Charlie Moore, the challenge I have with this question is: how are you planning on calculating CoC returns. There is no universal way, especially when directly owned.

If you buy a $1mm asset, you will likely be putting all $250k into the down payment, leaving nothing left to renovate. So your renovations will be from cash flow. So your early CoC will be 0%.

Or you buy a $600k place, and hold 50-70k for Renos.  Now, you have a Cash on Cash in year 1, because you are not using cash flow for renovations.  

Assuming the second way, anything north of 5% in year 1 is probably good.  Anything north of 10%, I would assume you are likely not underwriting correctly.  

I see many on these forums assume that a Class C or D property will have the same assumptions as an A or B.  But in reality, you will likely have more frequent turn over in C and D than A and B assets.  On top of, typically, higher vacancy as you wait for a qualified tenant to apply.  So more vacancy + higher turn over costs quickly eats into the C and D returns, often yielding returns only marginally better than A or B assets.  Additionally, C and D assets have lower rents, but roto-rooter and Home Depot don't care whether you get $500/mo in rent or $5,000/mo.  That plumbing bill or new appliance will generally cost the same, so higher R&M reserves, as a percentage of rent, are needed in lower quality/lower rent assets, too.


 Agreed, I had this exact conversation with another investor today when they brought up the lower purchase prices in small-town Minnesota.

Post: Hello from Duluth, MN

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Dan Manion:
Quote from @Tim Swierczek:

Hi @Shawn Frost.  Welcome to BP. There are regular meetings of investors in Duluth. There is a meet-up that I've spoken at twice. I can send you the meetup link if you PM me. I can't post it here due to BP rules.


 Would you be willing to send that my way as well? I'm new to real estate investing and my first property is in Duluth.


 Sure, please PM me and I will reply with the link

Post: Is Now a Bad Time to Start Out?

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629

@Gabe Morrell There has been a lot of good advice, rather than repeat it. I would suggest you want to get the HELOC in place no, because you want to be ready to act if something comes up. Although, this is one of the toughest cash flow markets I've seen you can still occasionally find deals that make sense when combining strategies such as value add and rent to own, or short/midterm rentals. The point being you never know what will pop up and being ready with a HELOC in place is a good idea in my opinion.

Post: First property, competitive market, any ideas?

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Michael Smythe:

@Mohammad Al-hadad investor expectations have been skewed by the last 5 years of low interest rates and artificially low prices.

10+ years ago, most investors focused on Class B and C properties, not Class A.

Reason: hard to get Class A properties to cashflow!

Class B typically cashflows from purchase or within a year or so.

Class C typically cashflow well from purchase, but has tenant performance challenges.

Read copy & paste info below:

Recommend you first figure out the property Class you want to invest in, THEN figure out the corresponding location to invest in.

If you apply Class A assumptions to a Class B or C purchase, your expectations won’t be met and it may be a financial disaster.

So, when investing in areas they don’t really know, investors should research the different property Class submarkets.

Here’s our OPINION for the Metro Detroit market (use as a template for your target area!) that we’ve learned in our 24 years, managing almost 700 doors across the Metro Detroit area, including almost 100 S8 leases.:

Class A Properties:
Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.
Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.
Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+, zero evictions in last 7 years.

Class B Properties:
Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.
Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.
Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680, some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 years

Class C Properties:
Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation. Can try to reposition to Class B, but neighborhood may impede these efforts.
Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, but 15-20% should be used to also cover tenant nonpayment, eviction costs & damages.
Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores of 560-620, many blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 2 years. Verifying last 2 years of rental history very important! Also, focus on 2 years of job/income stability.

Class D Properties:
Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, all cashflow with zero or negative relative rent & value appreciation
Vacancy Est: 20%+ should be used to cover nonpayment, evictions & damages.
Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores under 560, little to no good tradelines, lots of collections & chargeoffs, recent evictions. Verifying last 2 years of rental history and income extremely important to find the “best of the worst”.

Make sure you understand the Class of properties you are looking at and the corresponding results to expect.


 Great Post, thank you for spending the time writing it.

Post: First property, competitive market, any ideas?

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629

1. houses are for like 350,000 - 425,000 in Minnesota with rent from 1,800 - 3,300 so if I get a property for 415,000 with about 5,000 in rehab and rent for about 3,000 is this a good deal and how do I know what a good deal is? 

- I would not do this deal. I would look for small multi-unit properties with high bedroom counts. A 5-bedroom duplex in a solid area will generate $4500/mo in rent or more. Then you need to look for the one that has low expected CapEx for the next 10 years. These would be properties with good roofs, windows, siding, and mechanicals.

2. I always have family and friends giving me negatives like " what is it doesn't rent" or who is going to "pay that much for rent" or "what if the tenant burns the house down" are these realistic situations and how do I prepare and understand to to come back if anything like this happens how do I plan ahead. 

- My parents used to say the same things, I ignored them and now I'm a millionaire. There are plenty of people who will pay these rents, infact there are over 100's of thousands in the Twin Cities alone.  Of course, you need to use your common sense when comparing properties. One common mistake is that investors look at the high market rent and assume they can get it, or they use an average rent but their unit is below average. Shop your own unit like you were a prospective tenant and you will figure out exactly what is should rent for. Getting rent right is the easiest part of being a landlord. If you know how to shop for a rental you know how to get rent projections correct.

3. should I go for a newer house with little to no rehab for 415,000 or something like 350,000 with like 10-20 in rehab?

-I wouldn't look for single-family rentals in the Twin Cities in this market unless you find a steal or an owner-financed deal. Rates are too high to make those numbers work. You will be working your day job just to afford to subsidize the rent. See my answer above for more details.

Post: Investor Social Meet-up & Networking at Twins Suite

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629

Meet other investors and network at The Twins v Boston Red Sox Game on Sunday, May 5, in a premium suite. Come to meet other investors and house hackers. Talk about what is working and what is not working. Learn how to get started or how others still deal in this market. The host Tim Swierczek has purchased five rentals and 8 flips in the last year. Yes, deals are happening.

Beverages and game tickets are included. Your tickets will be texted, so a mobile phone number is required.

Tickets for this event are limited and cost the host $100 each plus beverages, so the $40 fee ensures only people who plan to attend register. No refunds will be given to cancellations and non-attendees. Please only register if you plan to attend.

Please use the Meetup link to register

Post: Out of state investing in Minnesota

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Hunter Hessian:
Quote from @Tim Swierczek:

@Hunter Hessian In my opinion OOS investing is best when there is some reasonable scale. For example, it's hard to justify airfare for one duplex, but much easier for an 8-12 unit building and even better the more you get. That said you may test with some smaller units with plans to move bigger if you like the area. 

Jay is correct about Minneapolis & St Paul's laws and attitudes toward landlords are tough. That being said Minneapolis has been very good to me as an investor and I'm still adding properties there.  Minnesota does offer more appreciation than other Midwest markets and has traditionally been a balanced market for cash flow and appreciation, which I think is ideal. If you can handle the red tape and jump through the hoops, Minneapolis and St Paul have limited your competition and I see investors with a positive attitude growing in our market. Feel free to reach out if you want to meet on Zoom and talk about it.


 Thanks Tim, good to know that people are able to find success with the right type of deals in the area. It would be great to connect sometime and discuss the market. 


 I'm open to connecting. Please PM me if you want to set up a Zoom or call.

Post: Bedbugs- tenant brought them in, feels the landlord is financially liable for removal

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Kyle Kipka:

I was recently notified by my tenants that they have bedbugs in their unit and they've obtained 3 bids from exterminators for removal. In all 3 cases it was the opinion of the professional that infestation was related to recent travel and the tenants have been in the unit for 6 months. 

The unit was vacant for a month or so prior to their move-in and had been professionally cleaned. They also admitted that the bedbugs weren't there until recently and that they likely brought them in but they still feel that I should be financially responsible for removal costs (averaging about $2500). 

I declined and suggested they move forward with the bid they felt most comfortable with at their own expense but they then seemed to threaten legal action in a veiled manner citing their understanding of Minnesota state law which they feel puts the duty for pest removal on the landlord. This property is located in Minnesota. 

I do not have a specific pest clause in my lease but I struggle to see how someone bringing bedbugs into my property after 6 months without them, admitting that they likely brought them in and having a professional opinion stating as much would then require me as the landlord to be on the hook financially for removal? Do I need to be worried? Property is not located in St. Paul or Minneapolis proper so I don't think this city has specific regulations for that but I will confirm. 



 Kyle, you are correct, you should not be responsible, but the fact is MN law requires you to pay unless you can show the bed bugs are a result of willful, malicious, or irresponsible conduct of the tenant or a person visiting the tenant, which is nearly impossible to prove. It's my opinion that you should use a heat treatment and not a chemical treatment as heat treatments are comprehensive and can be guaranteed, and spray treatments do not always kill all bed bugs and can be a waste of money. I'd be happy to discuss this with you as I went through this myself about 10 years ago.

Post: Landlord insurance question

Tim Swierczek
Posted
  • Lender
  • Saint Paul, MN
  • Posts 1,537
  • Votes 1,629
Quote from @Nirmal K.:

I live in California but have a property in MN that’s currently rented out. The California State Farm agent says they can’t write policy for MN property and MN agent says he can’t write policy because I live in California. Is that a thing? They are refusing to write my policy for no apparent good reason. I have been with State Farm for 8 years. One small claim so far. 


 I think this is a State Farm issue. I live in MN and own a rental in CO and Travelers insured me through a CO agent. I would go to an insurance broker and see what options they have. You will not want a policy for only a rental, you will likely need to switch companies so that your primary, autos, and rental policies are all with the same company. Agencies are state-licensed and it's rare that an agent would be licensed in both MN and CA, expect they will be written through different agents.