Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Thomas Coburn

Thomas Coburn has started 4 posts and replied 31 times.

Post: How to Protect Equity in Divorce WA State?

Thomas CoburnPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 40
  • Votes 12

Hello. I'm Thomas and could really use some guidance on protecting and eventually receiving my share of equity in the marital home.

I'm finalizing a divorce in Washington state. I paid for two different consultations with a divorce and real estate attorney. And received different suggestions.

I'm happy to pay someone here for a consult on how to protect myself and reach an agreement.

My ex's attorney is waiting for my response. Trial, which we've already postponed once, is set for early March. She said we need to have everything agreed to and entered in the final order with the court to prevent trial, even though we've agreed on every point except this one.

Specifics:

*  Finalizing divorce.
*  Washington state.
*  Wife and I both on title.
*  Only wife on mortgage.
*  Equity in the home.
*  Wife will continue to live in home.
*  Wife responsible for maintenance and repairs.
*  Wife cannot refinance and pull out my half of equity because she is self-employed and W-2's minimal income.

    Obviously, the cleanest and safest route (for my half of the equity) is to force sell of the home. However, there's a human element and I do have compassion for my ex. So, I don't want to do this. And, I don't want to carry a note. The less contact between my ex and I, the better.

    My ex's attorney has suggested the following, which feels like it provides little protection for me:

    *  We both remain on title.
    *  We get three CMAs and/or appraisals and agree on current market value.
    *  Include a "forced sale" clause executes in 12 months if ex is unable to refinance and cash me out during that time frame.
    *  Wife pays a to-be-agreed-upon interest rate on my half of the equity until it is cashed out.

      Questions:

      *  How would you resolve and protect yourself, outside of selling the home?

      *  What requirements and contingencies (i.e. umbrella and earthquake insurance policies; ex to forfeit some or all of her share of equity to make me whole, etc.) would you include for protection against possible forms of loss (i.e. lawsuits, natural disasters, mortgage default, property neglect/deterioration, etc.? )

      *  Should I remove myself from title to limit potential liability while placing a second lien in the amount of my share of the equity?

      *  Can/should I include a clause that home be appraised now, and at the date of my equity cash out, and the higher of the two values be used?

      *  What language to include in the "forced sale" clause so ex has no legal recourse or ability to stall or delay?

        Thanks a lot for your time and consideration in replying. I truly appreciate it.

        Thomas

        Seattle, Washington

        Post: Sold! $52,000 Profit Flip, despite challenges

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12

        @Tarl Yarber

        Congratulations! 

        That's a great turnaround, especially with the partnership issues. Glad it worked out. And your improvements look great!

        And you've inspired me... I never posted the pics or deal details on my first flip. I'll do so tonight!

        Looking forward to connecting with you and potentially doing deals. 

        Thanks,

        Tommy

        Post: ​Exuberant Frothiness in Seattle?

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12
        Originally posted by @Adrian Chu:

        Homes in Seattle are at around 2007 pricing and/or higher, depending on different circumstances.  Rent is MUCH higher across the board.   I don't have the stats for this but I am sure median income per capita now in the Seattle area is much higher now than in 2007.

        The tech industry is much stronger now than in 2007.  The growing tech industry brings both technical and non-technical people to Seattle.  For technical positions, many people enter the workforce straight out of school with base salaries in the high 5 figures, and even low 6 figures.  With a $100k salary from a single person or 2 people @ $50k each, buyers can afford homes $500k-600k with the proper down payment.  That happens to be the price of an in-city townhome.

        Minimum wage is trending towards $15 per hour in Seattle, so that will simply make housing even more expensive regardless of whether one buys or rents.

        Up in Snohomish County, Boeing Everett is expanding.  Overall salaries at Boeing are quite high relative to home prices up north.  There are still condos under $100k up there, which are within reach to first time home buyers.  Single family new construction are in the $300s.

        Seattle is still much cheaper than the Bay Area + the benefits of no state income tax. Salaries with large tech companies are more or less the same here compared to the Bay Area.  From a personal finance and real estate perspective, Seattle is a very attractive place.

        Looking back at history, prices are higher than the last peak that had  a bubble.. so will the bubble burst this time around?!  Only time will tell... but it really depends on how the overall economy in Seattle will fare.

         Hi Adrian. Great post.

        A few of my thoughts.

        * Economy: Knock-on-wood, but Seattle is among the lowest risk of recession anywhere in the country. The influx of tech jobs directly into downtown is staggering. My wife has a wellness center right on the edge of South Lake Union, and there already 10,000+ tech employees into an expected 50,000+ migration over 5 years. We're in year 2 of that process. Combine this with the strong blue collar/trades like Boeing, etc. and it's solid.

        * Houses prices: I agree, prices have rebound, even surpassed 2007 in Seattle directly. They're close in surrounding areas. 

        * However: wages have not been increasing to match housing prices, from my experience. Also, and probably most importantly, the market - everywhere - is STILL highly artificially propped up by interest rates. I simply can't and don't believe interest rates can continue at historic lows given that many foreign investors have been pulling out because of not making a decent return.

        * So, in my humble opinion, while I don't think we're in a bubble scenario, we're certainly at the top, and looking down, if not starting. Think about it... even a 1% increase in interest rates reduces the purchasing power significantly. A 2% jump? And prices are really affected.

        So... that's what I'm planning on. Great to buy-and-hold, if you find a deal. But I'm trying to find and flip as fast as possible while loans are still cheap!

        PS - If you follow the economist Harry Dent, he'd advise to sell everything and stock up on cash. My inference is he thinks we're on the verge of a MAJOR bubble nationally. That may exceed the last recession in terms of national housing values. And that the millionaire-maker days are just around the corner... if you have cash and credit.

        Post: Seattle market?

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12

        @ Kevin S.
        @ Loren Thomas
        I'm getting 1.1 in Des Moines.

        And my potential rent increases isn't matching property appreciation. And the 'equity' in the property isn't valuable until I sell, or loan against it. Kind of house-wealthy, passive-income poor right now.

        @ Curtis Bidwell
        Great suggestion. Thank you.

        @J. Martin

        Congratulations! What an accomplishment. Starting with $0. Working full-time. And especially... having this success in the ultra-hot SF Bay market. Wow! 

        Very inspirational. And very cool how you give back/mentor. A great, great example.

        Post: Do you need an LLC? Absolutely. There is No Debate About It.

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12
        Originally posted by @Dmitriy Fomichenko:
        Originally posted by @Thomas Coburn:
        @Dmitriy Fomichenko:
        2) Make new contribution. Unfortunately traditional and Roth IRA contributions are only $5,500 per year so it would be difficult to do some serious investing with that amount. If you are self-employed or a small business owner however, you can start Individual (also known as Owner-only) 401k and contribute as much as $53,000 per year! With this amount you have a lot more investment choices to self-directed your account.

        Dmitry - Your answer helps A LOT. Thank you.

        We are self-employed. Our business attorney set us up with SIMPLE IRA's about 7 years ago. So, my wife and I are both contributing whatever the maximum is. I think it's about $12K/year each.

        HOWEVER... a few of my mentors have personally drained all of their retirement accounts. They've paid the gains just to be done with them, and then used the cash to invest in real estate, betting on themselves rather than being tied to the stock market. 

        I've seriously been considering this. I'd be very interested in hearing your investing opinion on this.

        Thomas, did I understand you correctly: are you saying that some of your mentors took early distributions from their retirement accounts, paid taxes and penalties and used what's left to invest in real estate?

        In my opinion this is a poor financial choice for most people. Taxes and penalties could wipe out 35-50% of your retirement savings if you take early distribution. 

        I agree that investing in the stock market that most of us have no control over is not a good choice, but that is where self-directed IRA or Solo 401k comes in. It allows you to have total control over investment choices and gives you the ability to invest in something that you understand and have more control over (real estate, trust deeds, tax liens, private lending, private businesses, etc).

        Correct. They emptied their accounts. Took the penalty and tax hit now, while still earning income. Thank you for your opinion.

        And Bill, sorry if topic went astray. I was commenting on the returns cited by another member in his reply. It was good learning for me. Thanks, and take care.

        Post: Do you need an LLC? Absolutely. There is No Debate About It.

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12
        @Dmitriy Fomichenko:
        2) Make new contribution. Unfortunately traditional and Roth IRA contributions are only $5,500 per year so it would be difficult to do some serious investing with that amount. If you are self-employed or a small business owner however, you can start Individual (also known as Owner-only) 401k and contribute as much as $53,000 per year! With this amount you have a lot more investment choices to self-directed your account.

        Dmitry - Your answer helps A LOT. Thank you.

        We are self-employed. Our business attorney set us up with SIMPLE IRA's about 7 years ago. So, my wife and I are both contributing whatever the maximum is. I think it's about $12K/year each.

        HOWEVER... a few of my mentors have personally drained all of their retirement accounts. They've paid the gains just to be done with them, and then used the cash to invest in real estate, betting on themselves rather than being tied to the stock market. 

        I've seriously been considering this. I'd be very interested in hearing your investing opinion on this.

        Thanks a lot.

        Post: Do you need an LLC? Absolutely. There is No Debate About It.

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12

        @Rod Fisher

        Sorry for double post.

        Post: Do you need an LLC? Absolutely. There is No Debate About It.

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12

        Now it makes 18 to 20% return in tax deferred income. At least I know how to make money on a house. it's not like the guy calling me telling me we need to move this investment into that investment so he can bleed a commission out of my account. house one paid for house two in three years. the two houses should buy house three in two years. all inside the IRA. Call me crazy, but my plan is to take some of the rental income as disbursements when I retire and never touch the assets.

         Very interesting post. Thank you. When you write that you're getting a "18 to 20% return", what do you mean? Is this appreciation? Increase in the market? Just curious the return is driving by the market/economy or is static/based on rents paying down principal.

        I'm curious because I have money sitting in a cash retirement account. Not even making 1%. Been debating about pulling it all out and using as more investment capital. Then I've heard of scenarios like yours.

        Also... do you know if I can place an existing property I own into my retirement account?

        Thanks a lot.

        Post: Anyone read BP member David Krulac's book??

        Thomas CoburnPosted
        • Real Estate Investor
        • Seattle, WA
        • Posts 40
        • Votes 12
        Originally posted by @Aaron Mazzrillo:
        The one important lesson he teaches: Whatever you feel now, money will only exacerbate that. If you aren't happy having no money, you'll just be more miserable with it. If you're cheap, you'll be cheaper. If you have a bad attitude, you'll be meaner. If you like to give, you'll give more. If you're happy, you'll be happier. So, be happy with what you have, who you are, and how you live. Happiness is an art form, not a destination.

         Aaron - Thanks A LOT for that summary. Honestly, that's one of the most powerful summations, written plain-and-simple, that I've ever read, about anything.

        It's a VERY good reminder and very applicable to my life right now, my aspirations in real estate and life in general, and more importantly, with how can impact/benefit others.

        So... thank you for posting. Very, very helpful.

        Tommy