Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tom O.

Tom O. has started 11 posts and replied 210 times.

Post: Would you purchase strictly for cash flow?

Tom O.Posted
  • Chicago
  • Posts 214
  • Votes 165

I always buy for cash flow and am shocked at the appreciation. These are multi-unit buildings and I am pushing up the rents by fixing up the units and making them better. I really like rural areas near urban areas. 

Why ask us when you can just google it? Look what I found in about 6 seconds: 

https://www.disruptequity.com/...

Anyone? They're after me now. How are they? 

Post: Depreciation not enough to offset taxes

Tom O.Posted
  • Chicago
  • Posts 214
  • Votes 165

you don't depreciate the land only the building. 

Post: Chicago Lakeshore East Condo

Tom O.Posted
  • Chicago
  • Posts 214
  • Votes 165
Quote from @Emily Hsieh:
Quote from @Tom O.:

Do you have a question?

Hi Tom - No question! When signing up for BP, they asked me to list my investment properties to include as part of my profile. 

 Welcome to BP. I live near your old address. It's a great area. Where did you move to? Are you doing RE there? 

Post: Buy less with cash or more with financing?

Tom O.Posted
  • Chicago
  • Posts 214
  • Votes 165

More doors is more money. Real simple. Leverage is your friend. Especially in times of high inflation. You save your valuable today dollars and get to repay in future more worthless dollars. 

Post: Chicago Lakeshore East Condo

Tom O.Posted
  • Chicago
  • Posts 214
  • Votes 165

Do you have a question?

FHA loans will consider rental income to some degree as long as it is documented. So that's no reason for making a decision one way or another.

I always prefer more doors to less so I would prefer the 5 versus the 4. But if you can get a very low money down loan on the 4 versus the 20 percent down on the 5 that would obviously favor the 4 unit. You have to run the numbers and see how things fall out. I've even seen folks buy duplexes and split them later and sell one half the duplex for the price of what they paid for the whole thing. 

If you have the 20% down and don't mind putting it into the building, the 5 unit might make sense. As a first-timer I still think the two duplexes probably makes the most sense for you. You can put a very low downpayment down and have adequate reserves. There are no money down loans available from the USDA if it is a very rural area. 

Good places to look for loans: credit unions (especially if you are a member), small and midsize banks, mortgage brokers. 

Washington State is not considered particularly landlord friendly. 

Quote from @Crystal Smith:
Quote from @Veronica Mitchell:

I'm looking to see what are some of the multi-unit in and around Chicago area to buy in?



The next gentrifying neighborhoods in Chicago are: Lower West Side; Humboldt Park, Gage Park, Ashburn, South deering, Hegewisch, Garfield Ridge & West Elsdon.  

 What about Little Village? Seems to be on its way up. 

You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. When most folks buy things at low caps they don't have mortgages. They just park a ton of money into it and bank on the appreciation. If you're borrowing, you need a better deal in a shabbier but more profitable neighborhood.