All Forum Posts by: Tony Wilcox
Tony Wilcox has started 5 posts and replied 140 times.
Post: Commercial insurance for Multi Units

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
Yea no problem in Chicago here. Now if the units are 6+ that is a different story
Post: Info from various carriers on rates in the future

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
I just wanted to share with the group here about info I am receiving from carriers on the future of rates. I realize everyone has been seeing an increase in rates the last few years and probably on current renewals. What I can say is there is some light at the end of the tunnel here. I am starting to see reports from major carriers that the loss ratios are quickly falling. This means carriers will not be able to get approval to continue to raise rates through the department of insurance in various states.
This is all to say we should see rates starting to flatten out and not drastically increase as they have been recently. I hope this helps!
Post: State Farm Maximum Number of Insured Properties

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
This can be an issue with multiple carriers, Travelers being another one of them
Post: All Rental Properties with one insurance provider smart?

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
I have found my clients like the ease of use of one policy, and for discounts. If you have a claim some carriers are able to remove that one location from the others to help on cost and not have them rated for a claim for each property.
Ken, I know I said I was done but I have to educate you again. Also it doesn't affect me at all if a client files a claim. In fact if I wanted more premium, wouldn't I encourage higher prices for filing claims???? This is how it actually works....
Client calls in. Hey, I might have a leak in my roof.... I reply saying ok lets make sure to mitigate any future damage. Have you had a roofer out? No, ok please call one and if you don't have one I have a few resources. We want to make sure no more damage occurs. They get the roofer out right away to assess. They do this for free btw so no call to the carrier about this.
Then the roofer goes out to the house and gives us a breakdown on what is going on. Oh there is no shingle damage, or there is. Ok, what is the estimate to fix the home? Sometimes it's yes they need a new roof, then ok lets file the claim. Sometimes the roofer says well it's only like $4,000 in damage for me to fix.
That's when I talk to the client and say ok, your deductible is $2,500 so if the total amount to fix is $4,000 we can file for that and you would get the difference. Or if you didn't want that claim on your record since only 4k to fix, and wanted to pay out of pocket of course that is an option. I lay out what would happen to their policies at renewal if they do file said claim. I never say they will be dropped, because for one there's no way to know that until renewal.
If the client fixes themself and doesn't file a claim, then there is no claim registered on their policy. This is how it's done Ken. That is how you protect the client from malicious $0 claims counting against them. The client gets every possible option to make the decision themselves depending on their situation. I have never talked a client out of a claim, they get educated and presented options.
Also carriers don't just drop people automatically for $0 claims. It does happen but many carriers also don't count $0 claims against people.
Have a good day Ken and good luck.
Post: What's Up With Insurance in Connecticut

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
There are many contributing factors into why this is happening nationwide, and not just CT.
Carriers catching up to inflation (insurance lags behind inflation), and cost of replacing roofs/cars/houses.... It costs more now to replace/fix a car. Body shops are taking forever to fix them and car rentals are taking longer, which the carrier is paying for is just one example of many. Roofs are double what they used to cost 5-10 years ago.
They say there have also been more severe weather events. This means events that cause over $1B in damages. I am not sure if there are more events, or materials/labor just costs more for them to say it is a severe event. I posed this question to the head of Travelers personal insurance department at their HQ. He couldn't give me an answer on that!
Carriers cannot match what is needed to charge in certain states that limit what they can raise their rates too. This causes them to add restrictions, or just pull out of the market all together. If you are losing billions of dollars and can't match the rate required due to the state insurance department not allowing it, there is no need to continue business.
All coastal states have a possibility to be hit by a major weather event. You might think CT doesn't have any, but being on the coast there is always a change of a hurricane, or other severe weather events.
Many carriers, like Progressive, insure nationwide, and when severe weather events hit an area, it wipes out all premiums they had nationwide. This also causes them to raise rates or just get out all together.
Insurance also needed a reset after they were insuring homes at $700-1,000/year ($300,000+ dwelling coverage) with a $1,000 deductible. Think, how can they cover expenses insuring homes at this amount with a deductible the same as your car!
I know none of this will make anyone feel bad for the carriers, but they are a business and they are just matching what it costs to not lose billions of dollars.
This is my last comment on the matter. I can't believe I spent this much time debating something that is well known in the industry.
You are not required to report claim inquiries to the carrier. The carrier reps themselves (Travelers, Nationwide, Progressive, SafeCo, and many more) who come into my office all say the same thing. I am not sure where this info is coming from. As mentioned before, Travelers even has a hotline if you are a current carrier that you can call, they will look at your policy and tell you if you think you should file a claim. If you decided not to, they will not file the claim on the clients behalf. No harm no foul. If this was required to be reported to CLUE don't you think Travelers would be reporting these claims when people call the carrier directly?
Ken, the only clients losing money are with agents who report every claim inquiry to the carrier costing their clients money for no reason on $0 claims when the client didn't even want to file a claim...
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tony Wilcox:
That's great Ken, but no need to watch that video. We will just have to agree to disagree here. Also I wouldn't stay with any agent that does this.
Ken I am part of many insurance groups in the midwest, along with being an agency of the year in 2024 that was selected by the carriers themselves, out of thousands of agencies. So I think I know what I am talking about.
The only thing that might be correct in what that Allstate agent said is it could be an Allstate ONLY thing. However; a claim being filed JUST to talk to an agent on if you want to file it is not an insurance industry wide thing.
Also Travelers has a whole hot line to call if the client should file a claim. Unless you actually file the claim with them it is not filed. Hope that helps.
That's great Ken, but no need to watch that video. We will just have to agree to disagree here. Also I wouldn't stay with any agent that does this.
Post: EQ Policy Renewal Increase - Should we continue coverage?

- Insurance Agent
- Posts 143
- Votes 67
Having dealt with FEMA in flood situations, they are the LAST people you want to rely on if you need help. They won't pay you anything on that if there was an EQ disaster. I will say there isn't anything that will help you on a policy for earthquakes except for adding the endorsement or a separate eq policy. It's pretty standard to have the higher deductible on those as well. Not sure the type of home, but sometimes you can decline masonry cosmetic coverage that can help with the rate. Long story short if you are worried about the deductible, I would not considering it's meant for a total loss situation. Just my opinion