All Forum Posts by: Ty Man
Ty Man has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.
Post: 1% Rule vs. Potential Growth

- Honolulu
- Posts 6
- Votes 2
@Jordan Moorhead - Thanks for the input. Much appreciated.
@Matt R. - Great perspective. Yes, SFRs in Austin vs. Dayton. The SFR I intend to buy in Austin is new construction so my CapEx and repair costs should be minimal in the next 10-15 years. The properties I'm considering in Dayton, OH (Beavercreek, Centerville, Oakwood, Fairborn) are a bit older so there might be some more repair & maintenance costs. But much like @Paul Amegatcher's comments, it'll consistently rent close to 1% no matter what the cycle does.
@Ryan Evans - Thanks for the feedback.
Post: 1% Rule vs. Potential Growth

- Honolulu
- Posts 6
- Votes 2
1% Rule seem hard to achieve (at least harder to find) in "hot" growth RE markets (i.e. Austin, Seattle, etc.) but easier in some RE markets (i.e. Ohio, Missouri). Would you rather do a buy & hold (holding period of at least 10-15 years) rental investment in a "boring" low growth market but achieve 1% rule or invest in a "hot" growth RE market, aim for appreciation but only achieve a 0.65-0.70% rent/purchase ratio? Thoughts? My risk tolerance is high but I also want to be smart about it.
Reason I ask is I am currently deciding between buying a rental in Dayton, Ohio (achieve 1% rent/ratio but zero to little appreciation) or buying a rental in Austin (0.70% rent/ratio but better growth prospect). What other factors should I consider? Thanks!
Post: LLC Formation: DIY, Legalzoom or pay a lawyer

- Honolulu
- Posts 6
- Votes 2
Post: Austin new construction SFRs good deal?

- Honolulu
- Posts 6
- Votes 2
Originally posted by @Merv Screeton:
A 30 year loan will give you more breathing room and you still have the option of paying it off in 15 years.
Very valid point, especially if things go south in Austin.
Post: Austin new construction SFRs good deal?

- Honolulu
- Posts 6
- Votes 2