The price reductions just weren't enough to move the needle I think. 

I am seeing .63% or greater reduction in rate between a 20% down and 30% down right now.

The risk profile should be reduced as each life cycle milestone is reached with the greatest reduction in risk once the stabilization occurs.

Before S-corp:- Income tax: $85k- FICA / SE tax: $16k- Total: $101kWith an S-corp:- Income tax: $75k- FICA / SE tax: $13k- Total: $88kWe still have $13k of savings, but with a completely different breakdown which makes no sense whatsoever: suddenly a reduction in income tax (which I said would not happen) while virtually no SE tax savings (which should have happened).7.

Even if you don't measure from the peak, we are looking at a 20-25% reduction in existing home sales, with huge GDP implications.

I see properties for rent sitting for months in my market currently even after multiple reduction of rent amount

Pick your markets that are heavy investor or BNB markets and start tracking DOM, price reductions and inventory.   

Or the seller could file a claim to get it fixed - but this takes time so I would still want a price reduction I think you have to figure that when someone is selling a mid reno house that there definitely is a reason - why else would they stop mid reno?

How much of a price reduction would IRS consider to create an "arms length" issue?

     - No principal reduction: You don’t build equity through payments during the IO period—only through appreciation