9 November 2023 | 6 replies
The Fair Housing Act - which applies to private landlords too - makes 'it is illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of a person's race, color, national origin, religion, sex (incuding gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, or disability."
12 December 2020 | 5 replies
There are specific financial institutions set up for lending to museums that adhere to your religion, I suggest you start there, not sure if there are any here in Columbus Oh, but maybe where you are?
5 February 2021 | 99 replies
I have 0 doubt absolutely 0 of this will make sense, because you "know" that you are the center of the universe and that tech is the single most important thing to everyone and anyone, you just know this to be true, facebook is a religion in your world, twitter the holy sacrament, only a total nut-job wacko would dare challenge how holly the temple of tech is.
10 October 2023 | 23 replies
Bigger Pockets is the right place to get the real juice of the situation and hear from different perspectives other than a person who is trying to create their own "religion" of motivational adages.
11 November 2023 | 13 replies
Be careful about how you answer the vouchers for section 8 question, as ever since HB20-1332 passed here in 2021, source of income is a protected status for tenants just like race, color, religion, national origin, disability, sex, and familial status.
17 October 2019 | 17 replies
The federal fair housing act protects tenants from discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion, national origin, sex, elderliness, familial status and disability."
20 September 2023 | 46 replies
To really drive home sales he got churches and religion involved as well to really solidify his name and reputation.
2 January 2021 | 41 replies
Psychologically, the pandemic has turned the concept of "home" into a national religion.
24 April 2021 | 99 replies
(Race, Color, Religion, National Origin, Religion, Sex and Family Status) are, as well as, for the Fair Housing Act.In fact, the Seventh Circuit weighed in on this precise question in Cortezano v.