RE Investment awakens a sleeping giant, kills the dormant ignorance, and stimulates a passion for lifelong learning.

But thanks for all you do to create jobs, provide housing, and stimulate our economy.

I believe those people who currently run their own groups could benefit (if they cared to hear what investors really want), as could anyone who might be interested in just setting up some kind of local group of their own.I hope people continue to drop by this discussion to share more details about things like club format (what's good and bad), club meeting frequency, agenda, and so on.This thread could really benefit a LOT of people, but we need more folks chiming in with their thoughts.If you've taken the time to read this discussion, please do leave some feedback.I started this thread because I think things need to change at real estate clubs, and hoped we could stimulate ways to do that.

The is a shot in the arm and yes RE values will inch up and stimulate jobs, to a point.

Taking a look at those $138 flights to Hawaii to help stimulate the economy later in the year. 

Needless to say, it is a bad tenant turned worse situation that has stimulated his motivation.  

The people I know with crazy amounts of money have to be stimulated intellectually and need some kind of charities, new business ventures, traveling, etc. 

We all want to have that very creative post that (triggers) stimulates everyone’s reaction.

IMO, the economy has been artificially stimulated for a while now.

There is a letter that was sent to the campaign which refers to an analysis:Letter: https://www.1031taxreform.com/fea-sends-letter-to-biden-campaign-regarding-the-importance-of-like-kind-exchanges-in-stimulating-the-economy/Analysis: https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/model-estimates/former-vice-president-bidens-tax-plan-march-2020/t20-0074-former-vice-presidentThe analysis makes mention of "certain tax preferences for the real estate industry," which one can assume is 1031 exchanges, but might also be depreciation, TPR, changes to passive income treatment, etc., but cites no sources.