We all agree that it is a potentially dangerous procedure but, in your experience, have you run across any indication that it is considered fraud under any particular laws?

Is that accidental, or is the procedure that (a) all areas are open to visual inspection, but (b) only the three, aforementioned locations are subject to dust wipes?

I wasn't even clear at the beginning about what the testing procedure was or how the mitigation effort would go if it was needed.

Makes me wonder though as it took us 10+ years of hammering the pavement and setting up systems, processes, manuals, procedures, personnel, tech, etc... before we could open the doors to "out of house" investors and before we could claim "We are a reputable and organized property management company".How the F@#$ do investors succeed in making the whole process work from afar is mind boggling to me.Again, big hat's off to those that succeed as I couldn't and thus why I moved to the best country in the world.God Bless America and here is to another 10+ years and standing the test of time (Before AI and the terminator take over lol)

Will they provide the systems, procedures, tax direction, making payments, insurance coverage, contracts, dealing with upset sellers and on and on? 

I have policies and procedures in place to make it easier for my staff and the Tenant.

So, can you please explain the procedure to prep, swipe and test? 

We have 100's of 1,000's of branded & unbranded squeeze links & data capture procedures all over the net.

It is not ready yet at any bank, as the Standard Operating Procedure has not been released by SBA. 

Each state has a Division of Real Estate who oversees broker operations & requires broker's to adhere to incredibly strict accounting procedures, audits and care of all of this money that flows in & out of their hands that is that of the client's (you) or the tenant's.