What are your thoughts on this logic? 

That's interesting logic, but I think it's clearly outside the bounds of the Act. 

But it does need to be logical and defendable.  

To me it seemed like a logical way off offsetting the increased risk of funding a project up-front rather than in an as-you-go basis.

Just trying to make sure my logic isn't terribly flawed.  

I feel it's simple logic, take smaller steps and later go bigger.

The logical answer is housing.

Many tenants currently are having problems finding new rentals to move to.2) Crazies may see ad and door knock anyways - upsetting current tenants, causing them to be more difficult during their MoveOut.3) No idea what the property condition is and how long it will take to RentReadyProperty owners always want their properties marketed ASAP, but rarely stop to think through these logical points!

My logic was that if it turns out I should have paid for my tuition, I could always just pay the student loan off with the money that I stashed to the side.

I'm jus trying to understand the logic/legality better.