Now, if someone used ChatGPT to get ideas and then used a mathematical proof to "prove" the idea or action, that would make more sense to me.

It can solve mathematical problems that would take conventional super computers billions upon billions of years, and do it in seconds. 

Start small and see what you are comfortable with before getting in too deep.As for leverage, mathematically, it makes the most sense in terms of ROI to put as little down as possible on each deal.

At 40 properties you really are looking at maybe 0.1% of the population or less that can mathematically hold so many properties.

And even if a person has the cash, they still should start with DSCR because it forces those so-important actions of NOT just getting into something because it's what you could get BUT forcing to ONLY get into what pencils out, what makes sense mathematically. 

It only highlights how callous big corp. is, it's simple mathematics exactly what will happen.

And of course there is the mathematics of the actual flips. 

What Mike put forward, besides being a complete violation of mathematics, is just bizarre. it's not different, it's saying 1+1= Llama.

Quote from @Frank Shearer: I was wondering if someone with more mathematical understanding has done a deep dive into paying off a car loan quicker by using multiple smaller payment like weekly or maybe 8 times per month micro payments.

It had to be planned out that way from start, that can't be coincidence, mathematically.