Making tenants responsible for common areas is a risky proposition. 

Hi everyone,
I’m closing on a single-family rental in Moore, Oklahoma, and comparing two types of property management:
1️⃣ Local PM (Hallmark Property Management)

10+ years in business, 4.6★ from ~70 reviews

~430 ...

I have a subject-to offer, but I'm unfamiliar with subject-to's and the due on sale clause issue sounds very risky.

However the risk is there, and even in a best-case turnkey investment scenario, your returns will be meager compared to an active investment strategy.

Bridge loans can be a great short-term solution, but timing is everything.
Have you used them to transition between purchases or refinances? What lessons or tips would you share with others considering it?

Always keeping up on reducing the amount of risk is crucial in investing.

When you treat each property like a business unit, the entire portfolio becomes easier to scale.Distressed doesn’t mean risky.

*This is risky for many reasons so proceed with caution!

The biggest surprises most people mention are how much due diligence still matters and how different managing paper risk is from managing property risk.

Anyone in southern Florida that could offer advice - def not looking for some program etc. would it make sense to try and partner with someone so someone else could help with identifying properties and both kindof would profit monetarily as well as stand at risk?